purely theoretical and idealist btw,I’m not that stupid lol. It’d just be funny to see 100 million untrained joes literally trample the bourgeouisie state unarmed.

Holy shit.

To all the liberals who say trump isn’t a fascist. Fuck you. Social-fascist traitors.

And good luck and stay safe, Amerikan comrades. 💜

Problematic?? They’re just as bad as bourgeois religious institutions attacking people for something like being trans and just trying to survive.

I always wonder… how many unarmed civilians would it take to overthrow a bourgeois state?

Excluding armed forces, there’s got to be a point where police get trampled and the pure horde forces submission to the socialist state.

The thought that socialism might actually be achieved in my country in my lifetime…

I agree. I think this war is a fight of imperialist versus imperialist.

After all, Russia gave up any notion of being a liberator when they betrayed socialism for bourgeois democracy in 1991. It is now an imperator like that of America — attempting to spread its influence as a state rather than spreading revolutionary influence.

I cannot confirm nor deny this as I have no evidence of this happening nor the experience of constant interaction within liberal social media. I never used twitter and such.

I don’t do the denouncing AES westcom thing tho… I just don’t talk about the more controversial topics I guess because here the answer is always yes and in non-far-left spaces the answer is always no. There’s no real need to debate things like the DPRK for me.

I dunno, I’ve never been called a tankie, but maybe that’s just because I inhabit far left spaces .

If you mean tankie in the sense of vanguard ism, then no.

Yeah Trotsky was still a Marxist, even if a revisionist

The music video is so peak lmao

The book by the same title - The Russian Revolution by Rosa Luxemburg.

It’s a critique, but it provides a great dialectical analysis of the Revolution and why it happened in its conditions.

I’m on my phone currently but probably the flag of the Spartacus League

My proof is the entire pamphlet ‘The Russian Revolution’. She always critiqued other socialist/communist ideologies as a friend, not a hater and her arguments were never not atleast somewhat dialectical.

Being used by others for something doesn’t constitute being that. I can understand why you’d think that though. Although she did discredit the bolsheviks, it was simple dialectics.

Rest in peace. Never a day where I don’t remember her sacrifice.

yeah, I get what you mean now and she was NOT ok with capitalism and was definitely a materialist from what I’ve read of her work.

She was around before the Soviet Union and mostly did Orthodox Marxist and Social-Democracy (classical/pre1920s not reformist or demsucc). Criticised reformism as well as the vanguard state but still acknowledged the need for revolution. Less of a western com revisionist than often Portrayed to be, more of a classical Marxist if anything. She was writing theory around the same time as Lenin so one isn’t really more revisionist than the other in a literal sense.

They won’t let me join, and im pretty sure it’s because I’m a luxemburgist. The revisionist argument goes out the window when you realise that V.I.L revised more than Luxemburg anyways… And I’m not one of those demsocs either, I’m a revolutionary Marxist….