I’m a computer science professor and affiliate law prof at Columbia University. Author of “Thinking Security”. Dinosaur photographer. Not ashamed to say that I’m still masking, because long Covid terrifies me.

  • 0 Posts
  • 3 Comments
Joined 2 months ago
cake
Cake day: November 16th, 2024

help-circle

  • @mattblaze@federate.social @CStamp@mastodon.social @60sRefugee@spacey.space @nyrath@spacey.space @simplenomad@rigor-mortis.nmrc.org Have you ever read “Wizards of Armageddon”? The “logic" behind some of the decisions was seriously insane and often driven by quite narrow interests. For example: initially, the (US) Navy’s submarine-launched missiles were inaccurate, so they advocated a city-destroying strategy, since that was all they could hit. The Air Force denounced that as immoral, not because they felt that way but because they could come close to military targets. Later, the Navy had more accurate missiles, so they preferred a counterforce strategy. But then the targets, e.g., missile silos, were hardened and warheads were very plentiful, so attacking cities with multiple missiles or bombers was preferred by the Air Force.