Well this is a take I can’t believe is being upvoted…

To answer your question, no every movie has been good. I’m sure if they made a Section 31 movie it would be good too but they never actually made it so we’ll never know.

Funny the Star trek cookbook I use has not produced many tasty dishes…

Reddit won’t ban the shitheads but they will summarize their post history so you can better determine who the shitheads are! …thanks?

the note says “please dont be that guy on the internet”

There are dozens of us!

Is this thing as sketchy as it seems?

Sam Altman and Andreessen Horowitz involvement should be all you need to know. But the reality is probably less dystopian than some people make it out to be. World to me just seems to be Altman trying to sell a solution to the problem that he’s trying to create with OpenAI (chatbots that are indistinguishable from humans).

Top comment explains that it’s real AI was just used to translate

Non humans yes, non persons…?

The whole point of federation is a variety of moderation styles so it doesn’t really make sense to federate in comments from other communities because it would take away any identity that exists

I noticed on the redditalternatives subreddit whenever someone mentions Lemmy and someone else is like “I didnt like it because of XYZ” someone else will often say “you should look into Piefed its much better”

Which is funny to me but at least it’s working!

Should just be “to prove you are human tell us how many 'r’s are in strawberry”

my instance required me to name a food from star trek lol

https://gitflic.ru/user/magnolia1234

It also pales in comparison to the carbon cost of printing out the poster and lighting it.

There’s Tasks.org, I remember trying it a while ago but I forget what turned me off. Not local-first maybe?

They’re different things, Aurora is a privacy respecting alternative to the play store app. F-Droid is it’s own thing but it’s library does have some overlap.

Best practice is to get both, and check F-Droir first.

innovation […] AI

[citation needed]

It worries me that there are scientists out there who are making studies based on the assumption that an LLM chat bot is a reasonable stand-in for a human in this context (in any context really but that’s another conversation). It’s just not what LLMs are, it’s not what they are designed to do. They’ve fallen for the marketing.

We address this question using a novel method - generative social simulation - that embeds Large Language Models within Agent-Based Models to create socially rich synthetic platforms. We create a minimal platform where agents can post, repost, and follow others. We find that the resulting following-networks reproduce three well-documented dysfunctions: (1) partisan echo chambers; (2) concentrated influence among a small elite; and (3) the amplification of polarized voices - creating a ‘social media prism’ that distorts political discourse.

1. lmao “generative AI chatbots trained on social media behave like social media users”
2. Shame on ArsTechnica they should be better than to publish a study like this.

what is happening in this post