zhunk@beehaw.org to Space@beehaw.org · 2 years agoNASA finally admits what everyone already knows: SLS is unaffordablearstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square49linkfedilinkarrow-up1108arrow-down10cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldhackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.party
arrow-up1108arrow-down1external-linkNASA finally admits what everyone already knows: SLS is unaffordablearstechnica.comzhunk@beehaw.org to Space@beehaw.org · 2 years agomessage-square49linkfedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldhackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.party
minus-squarezhunk@beehaw.orgOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·2 years agoIt looks like there are a few new articles since this one came out: https://spacenews.com/gao-report-calls-for-more-transparency-on-sls-costs/ https://spacepolicyonline.com/news/gao-nasa-not-transparent-about-unaffordable-sls-costs/ Neither of those mention SpaceX at all, and the OP article just mentions them and Blue in the context of engine prices.
minus-squareHypx@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoThere are Republicans in government too. They will always sell out to corporations over public interest.
It looks like there are a few new articles since this one came out:
https://spacenews.com/gao-report-calls-for-more-transparency-on-sls-costs/
https://spacepolicyonline.com/news/gao-nasa-not-transparent-about-unaffordable-sls-costs/
Neither of those mention SpaceX at all, and the OP article just mentions them and Blue in the context of engine prices.
There are Republicans in government too. They will always sell out to corporations over public interest.