The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 1 年前It's so overlemmy.worldimagemessage-square139linkfedilinkarrow-up11.12Karrow-down113
arrow-up11.11Karrow-down1imageIt's so overlemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 1 年前message-square139linkfedilink
minus-squareAnticorp@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 年前Now it’s making me identify developed pictures from a photo negative. I’m not quite sure what they’re going to do with that training since computers can already perform that task.
minus-squareTheOakTree@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 年前Also the “select the image below containing the example image above.” Like… we already have computers that can recognize image repetitions.
minus-squareCethin@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 年前So that’s almost certainly trying to gather data to defeat data poisoning. The other image is probably slightly altered in a way you can’t detect.
minus-squarebitwolf@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 年前A common OCR tactic is to turn the image negative and bump the contrast to make text easier to recognize. It could be a precursor for that step.
Now it’s making me identify developed pictures from a photo negative. I’m not quite sure what they’re going to do with that training since computers can already perform that task.
Also the “select the image below containing the example image above.”
Like… we already have computers that can recognize image repetitions.
So that’s almost certainly trying to gather data to defeat data poisoning. The other image is probably slightly altered in a way you can’t detect.
A common OCR tactic is to turn the image negative and bump the contrast to make text easier to recognize.
It could be a precursor for that step.