• @tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      77 months ago

      Well, if you consider farming torture, which I assume you do from the context, then four million chickens are about to stop.

        • @tal@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          147 months ago

          The term “ranching” is only for some types of animals.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ranch

          A ranch (from Spanish: rancho/Mexican Spanish) is an area of land, including various structures, given primarily to ranching, the practice of raising grazing livestock such as cattle and sheep. It is a subtype of farm.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poultry_farming

          Poultry farming is the form of animal husbandry which raises domesticated birds such as chickens, ducks, turkeys and geese to produce meat or eggs for food.

    • @stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      407 months ago

      No, the article makes it quite clear that they are chickens, not bananas, despite being yellow, they are both quite different

    • @pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      107 months ago

      Yeah, each broiler house can hold ~20-50k chickens (depending on size). A few million chickens is a pretty large operation. Most farms around here have about 20 houses max.

      • Neato
        link
        fedilink
        English
        57 months ago

        …why is the place where chickens are raised and kept called a “broiler” house?

        • @Ithral@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          167 months ago

          Meat chickens are called broilers, and egg chickens are called layers. Since they have been selectively bred for each specific purpose

          • @Nimrod@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            67 months ago

            Same thing that happens to all the male broilers: meat grinder>dog food.

            “Certified humane” doe

            • prowess2956
              link
              fedilink
              67 months ago

              My understanding is that dog food is sometimes the answer, but I believe in some cases it’s actually more “cost effective” to either compost them or just throw them away. The system is broken.

                • prowess2956
                  link
                  fedilink
                  27 months ago

                  I went vegan for a bit for much the same reason. In all seriousness, good for you, taking responsibility for your footprint and the consequences of your dietary decisions.

                  More recently I’ve started keeping chickens and ducks (predominantly for eggs, inevitably one day for meat), and it’s given me additional insight into how animal agriculture can be done more responsibly and how we can integrate it into our communities and to enrich our land.

                  I think it’s great to foster awareness and agency in our food system. If being vegan works for you, I think it’s wonderful. If being vegetarian works for you, also great. I remember the first time someone self-righteously told me they are vegetarian and only eat eggs, and I asked them what they think happens to the roosters since they’re still born at a roughly 1:1 ratio. Introspection occurred. And if someone still Insists that eating tons of factory-raised meat is the only way, well then maybe they aren’t ready to think about it yet but hopefully I can plant a seed that will germinate later.

  • Optional
    link
    fedilink
    137 months ago

    Y’know eating less meat will help save the planet.

    Because the water, power, and pollution expended would be less.

  • The Pantser
    link
    fedilink
    17 months ago

    Aw come on, that’s a lot of wings, if we promise to cook them well, can you drop off some to my house?

  • @tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    The Dispatch reported that the entire flock will be culled, with the remains isolated, to help prevent further spread.

    Kind of unfortunate that they can’t figure out which ones got sick and cull just those. Would be nice to move towards chickens that are more-resistant to the flu, but that can’t happen unless the vulnerable ones are selected against in terms of survival. An across-the-board cull doesn’t do that.

    • @Jaderick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      27 months ago

      Do we know the infection transmission method of this virus? Presumably if they knew they wouldn’t have to cull the whole facility right?

      • @tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        47 months ago

        It’s the flu, a respiratory disease.

        There may be other vectors (like raw milk), but airborne is going to be the main route for birds.

        Might be the case that some places have multiple buildings and can keep some chickens away from others. I don’t know whether that’s enough isolation.

        • Drusas
          link
          fedilink
          37 months ago

          A study completed just recently shows that raw milk is infectious, at least in mice. HTST (high temperature, short time–this is the most common method used in the US but not most of the world) pasteurization mostly neutralized the virus but not entirely. Batch pasteurization neutralized it. Just FYI.