Wats0ns@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 年前Inm looking at you Typescript devsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square48linkfedilinkarrow-up1534arrow-down113
arrow-up1521arrow-down1imageInm looking at you Typescript devsh.itjust.worksWats0ns@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 年前message-square48linkfedilink
minus-squareWats0ns@sh.itjust.worksOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down1·edit-22 年前So that next time your coworker uses the wrong type, the compiler can scream at him: “NO I WONT COMPILE THIS YOU DUMBASS, LOOK JOHN SAID ON LINE 863 THAT IT SHOULD BE A DOUBLE, NOT A FLOAT FOR FUCK SAKE”
minus-squarejflorez@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 年前Tell me you are a Java dev without telling me you are a a Java dev 😂
minus-squaremark@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·2 年前As a JS dev, I can only wish we had those types 🥲
minus-squarejdeath@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 年前you can still have that without having to declare the type manually. check out Swift or OCaml for example
So that next time your coworker uses the wrong type, the compiler can scream at him: “NO I WONT COMPILE THIS YOU DUMBASS, LOOK JOHN SAID ON LINE 863 THAT IT SHOULD BE A DOUBLE, NOT A FLOAT FOR FUCK SAKE”
Tell me you are a Java dev without telling me you are a a Java dev 😂
As a JS dev, I can only wish we had those types 🥲
you can still have that without having to declare the type manually. check out Swift or OCaml for example