Lemmings.world
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
sag@lemm.ee to Privacy@lemmy.ml ·
edit-2
1 year ago

[Solved] Now DDG also got AI features. Is it good or bad for Privacy?

lemm.ee

message-square
45
link
fedilink
95

[Solved] Now DDG also got AI features. Is it good or bad for Privacy?

lemm.ee

sag@lemm.ee to Privacy@lemmy.ml ·
edit-2
1 year ago
message-square
45
link
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    If it’s as private as they claim it shouldn’t be an issue.

    • sag@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I hope so

    • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      how can we make sure that claim isnt bullshit?

      • pietervdvn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        How can we make sure their privacy claims about search aren’t bullshit?

        (I still trust them though, just pointing out it is an equivalent problem)

  • Ilandar@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It is neither, their AI search features only optional at this stage. It is one of the most private implementations of AI that I’ve seen though.

    • 7heo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is one of the most private implementations of AI that I’ve seen though.

      Based on what information/criteria?

      • Ilandar@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        Privacy policies.

        • 7heo@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Thanks.

  • dragnucs@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Try SearXNG. SearXNG is a free internet metasearch engine which aggregates results from more than 70 search services. Users are neither tracked nor profiled. Additionally, SearXNG can be used over Tor for online anonymity.

    List of available instances.

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Duckduckgo is also available on Tor. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=duckduckgo+onion&t=fpas&ia=web

      • ChallengeApathy@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        As is Startpage now.

        • Andromxda 🇺🇦🇵🇸🇹🇼@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Startpage is owned by an advertising company

          • ChallengeApathy@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            And DDG is on record for censorship and caving to Microsoft. They also both provide results based off MS and Google results.

            Neither are ideal. It’s why only use them as a fallback. Brave Search all the way.

            • Andromxda 🇺🇦🇵🇸🇹🇼@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Brave sucks

              https://boehs.org/node/not-brave

              https://spyware.neocities.org/articles/brave

              • ChallengeApathy@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I very, very strongly disagree.

          • pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Removed by mod

            • Andromxda 🇺🇦🇵🇸🇹🇼@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              What a great argument! You definitely convinced me and everyone else! Congrats!

              • pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Removed by mod

                • Andromxda 🇺🇦🇵🇸🇹🇼@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  This one was so obvious, if you really need the /s to understand that I’m not being serious then you are dumb as fuck. You are the troll who responds to legitimate criticism with “shut up”.

  • marcos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s neither. Why do you expect they calculating an answer to have any impact at privacy?

    • sag@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean DDG search is safe, but my search results and search queries are going through AI, who knows they are collecting it

      • marcos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        DDG already sends your search query to third parties. What they don’t send is your identity.

        (Or, at least they say they don’t, whether you trust them is your option. Any 3rd party can betray your trust.)

        Anyway, that image implies an in-house implementation.

      • Anamana@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It only goes through their Wikipedia LLM if you push that button

        • sag@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Really? It mean it only use Wikipedia. Then IDC.

          • Zoot@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Personally I’ve used it a few times, I tend to get my answer significantly easier than wading through the shit results DDG has been giving me.

  • fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    No, VLC is its own thing however it uses libavcodec from the FFmpeg project for a large number of the codecs included in VLC. But VLC is far from being just an FFmpeg GUI.

  • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is it good

    no.

    • sag@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh no :( DDG also becoming bad. Can you suggest me any other search engine (Not Self Hosted one).

      • RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        DDG is still the best non self host search engine imao. But Startpage and Swisscows are also great options and don’t have the AI stuff and some neat features like private preview (both) or music search (swisscows). Of those two options startpage is superior in privacy

      • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m currently stuck using DuckDuckGo myself, just with the AI fluff disabled in settings. I’ve tried various other search engines but they’re either also buying in the LLM hype, or are just Not There Yet™ (https://stract.com, for example), or both.

      • ChallengeApathy@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Brave Search. At this point, I almost never need a different one. They also have optional AI but they’re doing so in a way that preserves privacy.

  • Andromxda 🇺🇦🇵🇸🇹🇼@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    They claim not to save your chats and not to use them for improving the AI model. Using GPT-3.5 Turbo through DuckDuckGo is definitely better than using your phone number to sign up for an OpenAI account, so yes, I think it makes sense to use this. But ideally, you could just run an AI model offline on your own hardware, I recently saw a Lemmy comment that explains this very well: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/10348570

    You can also use @db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com’s AI Horde as explained here: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/9295041

  • massivefailure@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why.

    To hell with anything using this AI garbage. Apparently I’m going to have to completely stop using computers because all these idiot companies are using this trash technology that just steals from other sites and presents it as its own. Time to move on from DDG.

  • conductor
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you will use it your question will be sent to OpenAI or Anthropic and possibly DuckDuckGo companies + search engines it is connected to.

    If you don’t your question will be sent to the website you chose, possibly to DuckDuckGo + search engines it uses.

    So you decide what is more private in this case.

  • meseek #2982@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly their results have been absolute shit for a while now. All I get are big business (mostly MS with Bing) results like Amazon links or worst yet, some BS AI built website with poorly stolen info meant to just push visitor traffic and not actually provide value.

    I’ve been looking into alternates and find Yandex actually provides real results. They don’t blacklist either something all the major US engines do because DMCA.

    At this point it’s like to I give up privacy and get real results or stick with DDG that seems in MS’ pocket so I have little trust they are still anonymizing your results.

  • Lad@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    deleted by creator

  • devfuuu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes.

  • ChallengeApathy@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    As unfortunate as it is, the only way privacy search engines will survive is by adding AI. Brave recognized this early on and implemented it very well, so I’m glad to see DDG seems to be implementing it well also. Hopefully Startpage catches up because even though I almost exclusively use Brave Search, I do enjoy Startpage as a secondary source.

    • RobotDaniel@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly I see no use for the ai response in search as it is hard to trust 100% but I do see that it could become a requirement for a search engine

      • ChallengeApathy@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree somewhat. I know how to use a search engine, I don’t need AI. The main problem is that, sadly, AI is going to be required to stay competitive.

        I will say Brave’s AI is very useful, though.

  • LazerDickMcCheese@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Some day surely Windows and Mac will get something similar to SearXNG, then you won’t have to worry about this stuff

    • Lemongrab@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah, self hosted local search engine on Microsoft’s platform? Lol

      • LazerDickMcCheese@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yep

    • sag@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I am a Linux user.

      • LazerDickMcCheese@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Then I’d suggest SearXNG. I use public instances because no one has made a way for me to natively host it myself, but I recommend it regardless

        • lemmyreader@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That reminds me : Last time I tried Garuda Linux it came with a local Whoogle instance.

          • Andromxda 🇺🇦🇵🇸🇹🇼@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Unfortunately it’s broken all the time because it gets IP-banned by Google. Perhaps they could implement something like the Invidious smart-ipv6-rotator to prevent this.

        • ᴅᴜᴋᴇᴛʜᴏʀɪᴏɴ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          What prevents you? Lots of people run their own instance.

Privacy@lemmy.ml

privacy@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !privacy@lemmy.ml

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

  • Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
  • Don’t promote proprietary software
  • Try to keep things on topic
  • If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
  • Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
  • Be nice :)

Related communities

  • Lemmy.ml libre_culture
  • Lemmy.ml privatelife
  • Lemmy.ml DeGoogle
  • Lemmy.ca privacy

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1.4K users / day
  • 3.89K users / week
  • 6.87K users / month
  • 16.1K users / 6 months
  • 172 local subscribers
  • 37.7K subscribers
  • 3.56K Posts
  • 94.2K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • k_o_t@lemmy.ml
  • tmpod@lemmy.pt
  • Yayannick@lemmy.ml
  • ranok@sopuli.xyz
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org