Lemmings.world
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
boem@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year ago

30% of Children Ages 5-7 Are on TikTok

www.honest-broker.com

external-link
message-square
214
link
fedilink
516
external-link

30% of Children Ages 5-7 Are on TikTok

www.honest-broker.com

boem@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year ago
message-square
214
link
fedilink
And why did youth mental health problems accelerate after 2010?
  • endhits@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “In my household, the only addictive spyware we use is made in the USA!!!”

    Edit: everyone below me is proving my point exactly.

    • Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      People love to repeat this, but US companies aren’t coming from a place of hostile intent like china’s special brand of tik tok for the states.

      • KrapKake@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m not so sure about that, they seem pretty hostile to consumers and employees.

      • endhits@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        They’re both focused on profit. The only reason you see the other one as scary is because it’s owned by the scary scary Chinese. Red scare all over again.

        • jaschen@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          No tiktok is not focused on profit. It literally has one of the worst/non existent monetization systems.

          • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yup, vine ripoff with some tweaks and the same monetization issue

            • jaschen@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Case in point. Vine literally can’t survive and so shouldn’t TikTok. Unless of course it’s getting propped up by a government with endless funds and not focused on profits.

              • retrieval4558@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Why are you so convinced that an advertising platform that a 1/3rd of the country is glued to is unsustainable. And that’s ignoring the rest of the world, which is the majority of their user base.

                • jaschen@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The same reason why twitter was NEVER profitable and it had more eyes glued to it. World presidents were using twitter for announcements. Never profitable.

              • jorp@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                What’s the connection between Uber and China, then? I thought it was somewhat common for tech companies to be unprofitable for very long periods of time backed only by capital, but it may be China. Has anyone looked into this? Does Xi know what I like to order on weekends? Why haven’t we banned this yet

                • jaschen@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I wouldn’t consider Uber. This is closer to Vine vs TikTok. And we all know what happened to Vine.

        • Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why is Chinese tiktok different than that in the states then?

          • AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            Because the USA strong armed them into giving their platform handling to Oracle Corp, a top tier US govt contractor.

            But since pro-palestine cries can’t be silenced on TikTok as easily as Zio media, taking control of the platform is no longer enough

            • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              No, it’s literally a different app in China.

              • AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                It’s the same thing, the international one was called TikTok and the US version is handled by Oracle

                It’s called douyin or something idk in China but it’s the same shit

                • papertowels@lemmy.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Maybe it says something that China limits access to their kids

                  In 2019, Douyin limited users in teenager mode to 40 minutes per day, accessible only between the hours of 6 a.m. and 10 p.m. Then, in 2021, it made the use of teenager mode mandatory for users under 14.

                  Seems like a bit of a digital smallpox blanket.

        • jumjummy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          You say “red scare” as if China isn’t a hostile nation state to the US. Go look at western company penetration in China if you want. Are you calling it “western scare” when China blocks yet another western company? I didn’t think so.

      • exanime@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        So Facebook has the best interest of the people at heart?

        https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/11/facebooks-dangerous-experiment-teen-girls/620767/

        https://www.forbes.com/sites/kimelsesser/2021/10/05/heres-how-instagram-harms-young-women-according-to-research/?sh=50ff6082255a

        https://www.counterextremism.com/press/extremist-content-online-extreme-right-and-neo-nazi-content-located-tiktok-instagram-and

        • elleybirdy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          deleted by creator

          • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Absolute bullshit. Go ahead and prove what you said, I’ll wait here. Find any comments on Lemmy that are pro-Facebook or pro-Meta.

        • jaschen@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          1 year ago

          Facebook is not intentionally doing it. It was a byproduct of capitalism. While TikTok doesn’t care about profits and only wants to control our government and people.

          • exanime@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Most 10 years ago they were already manipulating people on purpose

            https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jun/30/facebook-emotion-study-breached-ethical-guidelines-researchers-say

            • jaschen@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes, to maximize ad spend, not to take down a government for another government’s benefit.

              • Richard@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                1 year ago

                You know though that the United States have “taken down” governments before? Americans do not have any right to feel superior on this issue in the slightest way

                • jaschen@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Does it matter what the US did or didn’t do? The US government should always put Americans first.

                  Should we not ban TikTok because ourfounding fathers had slaves too?

              • exanime@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                To do both… But keep your head in the sand as long as you want

                https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/mar/17/the-cambridge-analytica-scandal-changed-the-world-but-it-didnt-change-facebook

                • jaschen@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  They literally sold the data for money. Not trying to topple a government.

                  • exanime@lemmy.today
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    So they sell data for money, to people who wanted to influence an election … But you see that as different?

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hmm, here’s what Zuckerberg said when he launched Facebook:

        According to SAI sources, the following exchange is between a 19-year-old Mark Zuckerberg and a friend shortly after Mark launched The Facebook in his dorm room:

        Zuck: Yeah so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard

        Zuck: Just ask.

        Zuck: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS

        [Redacted Friend’s Name]: What? How’d you manage that one?

        Zuck: People just submitted it.

        Zuck: I don’t know why.

        Zuck: They “trust me”

        Zuck: Dumb fucks.

        Brutal.

        Could Mark have been completely joking? Sure. But the exchange does reveal that Facebook’s aggressive attitude toward privacy may have begun early on.

        They may not be trying to control elections (they certainly have their fingers in that pie too), but they’re still hostile to users.

      • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why would it matter whether or not it’s intentional, if the end effect is the same?

        • Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not the same. China wants to fuck up the American youth. That’s why their version of tiktok is so different from ours. But you already knew that I’m sure

          • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nah, I don’t use tiktok, Chinese or otherwise so I wouldn’t know the difference. But you’re missing the point.

            • USA organisations abuse social media to spy on and influence citizens.
            • Chinese organisations abuse social media to spy on and influence citizens.

            And yet, you claim one is inheritly worse than the other or should be preferered. To me, they are equally bad. If anything, the USA manipulation is worse - they can use that knowledge more easily and to greater effect than an attacker on the other side of the world.

            • fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago
              • USA organisations abuse social media to spy on and influence citizens.
              • Chinese organisationsgenocidal dictatorship abuse social media to spy on and influence citizens.
            • Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Are the American companies doing it in pursuit of destabilizing the United States population for the betterment of the CCP and its interests?

              Is the Chinese company doing it in pursuit of destabilizing the United States population for the betterment of the CCP and its interests?

          • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            China does not have a version of tiktok. You are repeating bullshit lies

            • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Douyin begs to differ.

    • ealoe@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unironically yes, at least the US government is something we can openly criticize and attempt to change while living within its borders. Try criticizing the Chinese government from within China, let me know how that works out for you. I’ll take homegrown American spyware any day.

Technology@lemmy.world

technology@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@lemmy.world

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


  • @L4s@lemmy.world
  • @autotldr@lemmings.world
  • @PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks
  • @wikibot@lemmy.world
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 4.15K users / day
  • 9.77K users / week
  • 18.1K users / month
  • 37.6K users / 6 months
  • 355 local subscribers
  • 69.8K subscribers
  • 15K Posts
  • 637K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • L3s@lemmy.world
  • enu@lemmy.world
  • Technopagan@lemmy.world
  • L4sBot@lemmy.world
  • L3s@hackingne.ws
  • L4s@hackingne.ws
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org