The two tobacco companies Altria and Philip Morris International combined made up 2% of the branded plastic litter found, both Danone and Nestlé each produced 3% of it, PepsiCo was responsible for 5% of the discarded packaging, and 11% of branded plastic waste could be traced to the Coca-Cola company.

  • @Lodespawn@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    547 months ago

    Time for the beneficiary’s of these companies to start footing the bill for cleaning up their garbage.

  • admiralteal
    link
    fedilink
    307 months ago

    This is for large plastics. Big pieces of trash.

    Microplastics are almost entirely just tire dust.

    • Track_Shovel
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17 months ago

      And yoga pants. Don’t forget yoga pants. Though if I get rare cancer, I hope it’s from girls in yoga pants.

    • krolden
      link
      fedilink
      17 months ago

      When they grind up large plastic it turns into small plastic

      • admiralteal
        link
        fedilink
        7
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        And yet even still the overwhelming majority of that “small plastic” is just… tire dust. That’s still the bulk of the material.

        That’s the vast scale of automobile pollution. Another piece of how horrific auto-centric society is for the entire planet.

  • @Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    22
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    11% of branded plastic waste could be traced to the Coca-Cola company.

    More than ten percent from a single company…

  • @bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    217 months ago

    When I buy a bottle of Coca-Cola I am not actually paying much for the sugary water. I’m paying for the convenience of having it in a bottle.

    In my mind, this convenience fee ought to be enough to pay for the convenience of also discarding said bottle. Otherwise, they really sold me the inconvenience of having to deal with the bottle that they use to distribute the sugary water.

    So, get on with it, Coca-Cola, clean up your shit. I already paid you.

    • federalreverse-old
      link
      fedilink
      11
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      This is really close to truth. So many of those products producing trash are useless (bottled water) or even actively harmful (soda, cigarettes). You don’t actually need to pay Coca-Cola at all. You just need a reusable bottle and a water fountain or tap.

      Coca-Cola and Phillip Morris will not suddenly start being helpful.

      In that sense: encourage your municipality, employers, etc. to set up public water fountains and no-smoking zones. (And if you really want sweet drinks, buy syrups.)

    • @Qwaffle_waffle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      10
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I believe this is true, Circle K gas station near me still has soda fountain drinks for 80-110 cents. The cans and bottles start at 2.50 or more.

    • @trolololol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      87 months ago

      I’m old enough that it was normal and not a hassle to bring your glass bottles to buy Coke and wherever fizzy drinks. But at one point that option disappeared.

      Also it helped that a family dinner would consume like a liter, and we didn’t have it everyday.

  • @HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    187 months ago

    Is it also a pretty safe bet these are most of the top 60 companies in the world, and we are the ones that buy all their generic crap in plastic containers?

        • @HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          47 months ago

          Surface level - yeah I suppose? What about those who make it, those who don’t dispose of it correctly, then those in waste management who don’t care where it ends up?

          • @Sizzler@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            It seems everyone in that chain has a responsibility of waste management. When costs inflate and services are reduced we see increased fly-tipping, and litter produced by uncollected bins, as well as shoddy disposal.

            I think it’s closely related to the broken window theory. One broken window = more crime. Some litter = more litter. Most are led by influence.

            • @HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              27 months ago

              I think you’ve hit it on the head with everyone in the chain being responsible- and I’ve never heard of the broken window theory but it makes alot of sense.

    • eggmasterflex
      link
      fedilink
      17 months ago

      I wonder that any time these statistics are brought up. Like 100 companies are responsible for 70% of greenhouse gases - well isn’t it cause there’s 8 billion people buying their shit? They’re not just running those factories for the fun of it.

    • @Thorry84@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      57 months ago

      Excuse my ignorance but what is Amazon packaging? Everything I’ve ever gotten from Amazon was packaged in cardboard, but maybe that’s a local thing.

      • @Crowfiend@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        47 months ago

        Don’t forget the big plastic bubble bags they use to pad the product inside.

        In my experience, they send your purchase in a box that’s easily 4x the necessary size, with the padding bubbles taking up the rest of the space.

        • @Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          27 months ago

          I’ve gotten a mix of bubble and paper cardboard but your right. Not just the padding but also the bubble bags they occasionally ship smaller stuff in.

      • @nyctre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Every now and then I’d get the package in one of those opaque gray plastic bags that many postal services use. Probably means those.

  • @birthday_attack@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    1
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Less than half of that plastic litter had discernible branding that could be traced back to the company that produced the packaging; the rest could not be accounted for or taken responsibility for.

    The branded half of the plastic was the responsibility of just 56 fast-moving consumer goods multinational companies, and a quarter of that was from just six companies.

    This seems to me like a self-fulfilling prophecy. Of course the biggest companies with the most easily identifiable packaging are going to be the ones identified in this study. The majority of the plastic, however, is not, and it’s difficult to tell who produced it.

    The article addresses this as well, mentioning that this is the reason we need traceability, so we can get the true metrics on who is creating and thus responsible for the bulk of plastic waste.

    The big players like Coke and others are obviously very much responsible for a big part of the problem. I just didn’t see people mentioning this part of the study in the comments, so I wanted to bring it up.