FenrirIII@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 year agoOpinion | The Supreme Court Has Already Botched the Trump Immunity Casewww.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square39linkfedilinkarrow-up1213arrow-down11
arrow-up1212arrow-down1external-linkOpinion | The Supreme Court Has Already Botched the Trump Immunity Casewww.nytimes.comFenrirIII@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square39linkfedilink
minus-squaredhork@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up54·1 year agoNot necessarily. They could decide they must come to that conclusion, but only after delaying long enough so the answer doesn’t matter.
minus-squaresnooggums@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·1 year agoIf they do make that decision then he could still be prosecuted while in office if reelected, which is how the system should work.
Not necessarily. They could decide they must come to that conclusion, but only after delaying long enough so the answer doesn’t matter.
If they do make that decision then he could still be prosecuted while in office if reelected, which is how the system should work.