kinther@lemmy.world to Space@lemmy.world · 1 year agoNew research suggests that our universe has no dark matterphys.orgexternal-linkmessage-square73fedilinkarrow-up1238arrow-down120
arrow-up1218arrow-down1external-linkNew research suggests that our universe has no dark matterphys.orgkinther@lemmy.world to Space@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square73fedilink
minus-squareDaft_ish@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down7·edit-21 year agoThese type of comments always throw me through a loop. Scientist: Makes hypothesis, does analysis, writes paper, and presents work for other academics to review. Lemmy poster: Logs into lemmy. Posts “i think not mr scientist”. Recieves upvotes. While I would certainly like to say I understood any of this. This post has not met any rigorous standard of debunking the researchers findings. It’s fine if you have knowledge on this particular subject but it kinda seems like you’re just throwing shade.
minus-squareacetanilide@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·1 year agoI get what you’re saying, but peer review isn’t exactly all that rigorous either
minus-squareDaft_ish@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-21 year agoThey meet the bare minimum of at least being a peer in their field of research.
minus-squareEndward23@futurology.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year ago While I would certainly like to say I understood any of this. This post has not met any rigorous standard of debunking the researchers findings. Thats not what the posting claimed to be. You missunderstand. Either intentionally or just as a fact.
These type of comments always throw me through a loop.
Scientist:
Makes hypothesis, does analysis, writes paper, and presents work for other academics to review.
Lemmy poster:
Logs into lemmy. Posts “i think not mr scientist”. Recieves upvotes.
While I would certainly like to say I understood any of this. This post has not met any rigorous standard of debunking the researchers findings.
It’s fine if you have knowledge on this particular subject but it kinda seems like you’re just throwing shade.
I get what you’re saying, but peer review isn’t exactly all that rigorous either
They meet the bare minimum of at least being a peer in their field of research.
Thats not what the posting claimed to be. You missunderstand. Either intentionally or just as a fact.