Lemmings.world
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
MicroWave@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years ago

Opinion | A Federal Judge Asks: Does the Supreme Court Realize How Bad It Smells?

www.nytimes.com

external-link
message-square
19
link
fedilink
192
external-link

Opinion | A Federal Judge Asks: Does the Supreme Court Realize How Bad It Smells?

www.nytimes.com

MicroWave@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years ago
message-square
19
link
fedilink
The reported behavior of some justices is not a matter of politics or judicial philosophy. It’s about ethics.
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • SophismaCognoscente@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s a good op ed and one with which any supporter of enlightened democracy should agree. The Supreme Court are playing fast and loose with public trust at a time when partisanship has crippled the other branches of government and polarization is dividing the country.

    How can anyone respect a court that explicitly has no ethical standard?

    • 🇸‌🇵‌🇪‌🇨‌🇺‌🇱‌🇦‌🇹‌🇪‌🇷‌@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      2 years ago

      What?! Are you saying judges shouldn’t be accepting lavish gifts from billionaires simply due to optics? That’s crazy talk. Money is speech because the… Oh wait.

  • delial@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    https://archive.ph/zxchD

    • hotspur@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      Doing gods work, clicked through hoping someone had posted an archive link—thanks.

    • nymwit@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Thanks! I’m really impressed all the embedded links (at least the nyt ones) to other related articles are also archive links.

  • stanleytweedle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s about lack of consequences. Ethics only constrain people that don’t have the power to not give a fuck about what other people think is ethical.

  • PantsOnHead@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 years ago

    The better question is: do they care?

    It’s pretty obvious they don’t

    • blivet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Unfortunately, that’s how it is. The last time I served on a jury we all got free donuts, because a juror on another case earlier in the day had brought in donuts for the court, and the judge and bailiffs weren’t allowed to accept them.

  • popemichael@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 years ago

    Why would they care? They are, consequence free, rewriting the laws to more fit their needs.

    They don’t need to justify their existence when there is no consequence for any action that they take…

  • hamid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    deleted by creator

    • fleabomber@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m probably being pedantic, but “any means necessary” sounds a bit too close to violent rhetoric for me.

      • hamid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        redacted

        • fleabomber@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          Ok. But what I’m saying is that you sound like you’re encouraging violence on him specifically.

          • hamid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            deleted by creator

          • TrejoPhD@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/89101-those-who-make-peaceful-revolution-impossible-will-make-violent-revolution

  • hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    The highest court in the land has lower ethical standards than pretty much any job out there. I have to report a gift of maybe $15 but these clowns who make decisions affecting hundreds of millions of people can do whatever they want. How can we even pretend we live in a democracy?

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    In defense, the justices invoked the “Whoever smelt it, dealt it” defense, and replied “no, u”

  • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    The Coke masks the smell of the pubic hair.

  • o0joshua0o@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    They are unelected, lifelong tyrants. They don’t care what we think.

politics @lemmy.world

politics@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics@lemmy.world

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 2.49K users / day
  • 7.64K users / week
  • 13.7K users / month
  • 28.6K users / 6 months
  • 133 local subscribers
  • 23.4K subscribers
  • 22K Posts
  • 594K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
  • aidan@lemmy.world
  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
  • 🌱 🐄🌱 @lemmy.world
  • Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world
  • JuBe@lemmy.world
  • Lasherz@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org