• @silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      324 months ago

      It’s not moronic; it’s a deliberate effort to discourage left-leaning voters from turning out.

      • @Dagwood222@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        174 months ago

        Exactly. Commenters always allude to some pie in the sky Left candidate who will sweep in and deliver us a perfect government.

        Guess what? Most Americans think Obama was a wild radical. That includes the people who voted for him.

        • Osa-Eris-Xero512
          link
          fedilink
          154 months ago

          Most Americans couldn’t tell you anything he did other than ‘Obamacare’. The wild radical thing was entirely a marketing strategy, and a wildly successful one at that.

          • @Dagwood222@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            74 months ago

            The Left needs to look at what the MAGoos are doing right.

            Remember Mark Twain’s old adage; a lie has traveled halfway around the world while the truth is still putting on its shoes.

  • @Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    194 months ago

    I hadn’t realized that a cancer patient might want the IVF option. Amazing how many people are expected to suffer so a few folks can feel self righteous

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    English
    94 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    That’s why cancer patients and oncologists are expressing shock and anxiety about the recent ruling by the Alabama Supreme Court that frozen embryos are considered children under the law.

    Worries are mounting that other states could adopt similar rulings that would impede fertility medicine for people, including many cancer patients, who say assisted reproductive technology might be their only way of having a family after treatments.

    The Texas resident, who asked to be identified by her first name only for privacy reasons, underwent fertility treatments following a breast cancer diagnosis in 2019 and has one frozen embryo stored in case she decides to pursue IVF.

    “It’s the same stories that you’re hearing from lawmakers after Roe v. Wade, saying, ‘Oh, I didn’t think it would impact this or that’ … [but] they’re making decisions for others,” said Robin Watkins, 41, who underwent fertility treatments to have her twin boys.

    While the Alabama ruling only applies to embryos, some patients fear that the laws could keep expanding and affect fertility-assisted treatments overall, including procedures such as egg retrieval.

    She said she hopes to have children in the future, and because of her BRCA2 gene mutation, which carries a higher risk for breast cancer, she will genetically test her embryos.


    The original article contains 1,408 words, the summary contains 208 words. Saved 85%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!