Tukma@lemmy.cafe to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前Israel Gaza: China condemns US veto of call for immediate ceasefire at UN - BBCwww.bbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square20fedilinkarrow-up1155arrow-down114cross-posted to: palestine@lemmy.caworldnews@lemmy.mlworld@lemmy.world
arrow-up1141arrow-down1external-linkIsrael Gaza: China condemns US veto of call for immediate ceasefire at UN - BBCwww.bbc.comTukma@lemmy.cafe to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前message-square20fedilinkcross-posted to: palestine@lemmy.caworldnews@lemmy.mlworld@lemmy.world
minus-squareRapidcreek@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down18·1 年前So just because there is no logic for a ceasefire not to address hostages, therefore whoever points that out must be sympathetic to killing? Sorry, that makes no sense
minus-squaremmcintyre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up19arrow-down2·1 年前You say it makes no sense to stop murdering Palestinian children unless Hamas releases hostages. Like, shooting children is a no-brainer. What makes you or Netanyahu any better than Hamas? Literally nothing.
minus-squareRapidcreek@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down17·1 年前No, I said there was no logic to calling for a ceasefire without addressing hostages.
minus-squareEldritch@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down2·1 年前It makes lots of sense. With a ceasefire Israel will stop shooting and blowing up their own hostages to be rescued.
minus-squareRapidcreek@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down14·1 年前That is not logical, that is your own fantasy.
minus-squareEldritch@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·1 年前Reuter’s is my personal fantasy? Wow okay zionist.
minus-squareRapidcreek@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down11·1 年前At least I knew the word zionist before October 7th and know what it means. It’s not really a pejorative.
minus-squareEldritch@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down2·1 年前You act like you were the only one. But then again, that’s not the only thing you’re wrong about.
So just because there is no logic for a ceasefire not to address hostages, therefore whoever points that out must be sympathetic to killing? Sorry, that makes no sense
You say it makes no sense to stop murdering Palestinian children unless Hamas releases hostages. Like, shooting children is a no-brainer.
What makes you or Netanyahu any better than Hamas?
Literally nothing.
No, I said there was no logic to calling for a ceasefire without addressing hostages.
It makes lots of sense. With a ceasefire Israel will stop shooting and blowing up their own hostages to be rescued.
That is not logical, that is your own fantasy.
Reuter’s is my personal fantasy? Wow okay zionist.
At least I knew the word zionist before October 7th and know what it means. It’s not really a pejorative.
You act like you were the only one. But then again, that’s not the only thing you’re wrong about.