This is the best summary I could come up with:

A core developer of Nginx, currently the world’s most popular web server, has quit the project, stating that he no longer sees it as “a free and open source project… for the public good.”

Later that year, two of Nginx’s leaders, Maxim Konovalov and Igor Sysoev, were detained and interrogated in their homes by armed Russian state agents.

While the criminal charges and rights do not appear to have materialized, the implications of a Russian company’s intrusion into a popular open source piece of the web’s infrastructure caused some alarm.

Comments on Hacker News, including one by a purported employee of F5, suggest Dounin opposed the assigning of published CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures) to bugs in aspects of QUIC.

MegaZone wrote to Ars (noting that he only spoke for himself and not F5), stating, "It’s an unfortunate situation, but I think we did the right thing for the users in assigning CVEs and following public disclosure practices.

F5 is committed to delivering successful open source projects that require a large and diverse community of contributors, as well as applying rigorous industry standards forassigning and scoring identified vulnerabilities.

The original article contains 833 words, the summary contains 188 words. Saved 77%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

I’m all for forming from businesses when executives think they know best for projects, but does this really boils down to CVE assignment or did I miss something?