Hundreds of Israeli protesters have blocked some humanitarian aid trucks from entering Gaza for a third day.

  • @OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3911 months ago

    Imagine taking three days out of your life to make sure a group of people under siege and already bombed into oblivion can’t get basic humanitarian supplies. Think about how big of a piece of shit you would have to be. These people deserve nothing but contempt.

    Didn’t the ICJ ruling say Israel had to ensure aid comes in? So the IDF should take away these protesters, right? Right?

    • @IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -311 months ago

      No the ICJ ruling didn’t impose any direct action nor forced them to let in aid.

      They ICJ in favor for israel to continue their genocide while trying to save face with empty words.

      • Dr. Bluefall
        link
        fedilink
        English
        211 months ago

        I mean, the ICJ can’t exactly enforce a ceasefire - it’s a “you and what army” situation.

        • @IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -111 months ago

          If they made a declaration of israel committing genocide and calling for a stop and entrance of food and water, all members would be forced to uphold the convention to stop genocide. All the ICJ did was call it “plausible”.

          They asked for years extra to “investigate” the claims. Because reading 84 pages in one month is too much work.

          It is unlikely the ICJ ruling would be upheld if they called for action, but at least the ICJ would have done it’s part. Now they are just complicit.

    • DdCno1
      link
      fedilink
      -1811 months ago

      The point of these protests is that the aid is just as if not more likely to benefit terrorists and enable them to hold out for longer than it is to reach civilians, which in turn makes it possible for these terrorists to continue their holding of hostages. There is ample evidence of Hamas stealing aid from the people who need it, including by force.

      Also, stopping these protesters from blocking the crossing would be the task of the police, not the military, but I suspect that you know that and were just looking for cheap polemics.

      • @OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1211 months ago

        But what about this?

        Ninety-three percent of people there face “crisis levels of hunger,” according to a report published in late December by a U.N.-backed international consortium. More than half a million people — a quarter of the enclave’s blockaded and bombarded population — face “catastrophic hunger and starvation,” the report said.

        Do we just let it continue?

        • DdCno1
          link
          fedilink
          -1511 months ago

          The quicker Hamas is defeated and the war is over, the quicker the humanitarian crisis can be solved. Hamas existing and the humanitarian crisis are inseparably linked to one another. As long as Hamas holds control over parts of the strip, nobody can make sure that aid doesn’t get diverted from the intended recipients.

          While I would personally send aid regardless - because even if only some of it reaches civilians, it would still be the morally right thing to do - I can understand why people who are personally affected by Hamas terror have a different view of this.

          • ???
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1211 months ago

            The quicker Hamas is defeated and the war is over, the quicker the humanitarian crisis can be solved.

            With Love,

            – Your Opressor with over 70 years of Apartheid and Ethnic Cleansing

            • DdCno1
              link
              fedilink
              -911 months ago

              Do you ever have doubts about yourself, your political views, your opinions and knowledge? Do you ever think twice about what you’re writing, perhaps even writing a comment and then not submitting it, because you are not sure about it anymore? I do, all the time, and while this is deeply uncomfortable, I wish you some of this discomfort as well. I think it would do you good.

              • ???
                link
                fedilink
                English
                611 months ago

                Are you implying I don’t? Can I ask why you’d imply that?

                • @hightrix@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  711 months ago

                  The person you are replying to is using a very typical social media propaganda playbook.

                  Ignore them and move on. They are trying to waste your time, frustrate you, and make you give up.

                • DdCno1
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -311 months ago

                  You appear exceptionally confident, yet your arguments often consist of nothing but generic talking points, are paper-thin without an ounce of nuance. That’s not meant to be insulting, but merely an observation.

                  I can’t look into your mind, but that’s how you are conducting yourself here. If there is any doubt, any uncertainty, any nuance in your thought, you are not sharing it - or I missed it entirely.

          • DeceptichumOP
            link
            fedilink
            911 months ago

            There has been a humanitarian crises in Gaza for decades, why do you think they’ve been getting aid for so long?

            Unfortunately the crises is called Israel and its backed by the US along with every other western democracy.

            • DdCno1
              link
              fedilink
              -611 months ago

              This conflict is far more complicated than just blaming it on one party alone. I can only advice you to strive for a more nuanced understanding of it, because if you keep maintaining a view this one-sided for long enough, you will unknowingly learn not just to ignore evidence to the contrary about this conflict, but any other topic that you already have a more or less firm opinion on. You do not want to become that kind of person.

              • ShroOmeric
                link
                fedilink
                English
                411 months ago

                There’s nothing complicated: there’s a nation of racists bigots hellbemt on apartheid, athnic cleansing and genocide. And it’s called Israel.

              • DeceptichumOP
                link
                fedilink
                2
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                Thats highly ironic from the person who only posts comments critical of Hamas, while supporting Israel.

                At least I hate both of them.

                • DdCno1
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -311 months ago

                  Enlightened centrism is neither enlightened nor centrism.

                  I just tormented myself writing this and I’m happy to torment you with it:

                  https://kbin.social/m/world@lemmy.world/t/794481/Kerem-Shalom-crossing-Israeli-protesters-hold-up-aid-trucks-to#entry-comment-4838791

                  If you still think that’s one-sided support of Israel, then I can’t help you.

          • @OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            411 months ago

            While I would personally send aid regardless - because even if only some of it reaches civilians, it would still be the morally right thing to do

            I wish you were in charge instead then.

            • I can understand why people who are personally affected by Hamas terror have a different view of this.

            But I can not. Nothing justifies doing this. Even starving an actual member of Hamas as a weapon of war is fucking disgusting

            • DdCno1
              link
              fedilink
              -311 months ago

              A starving person can, at least in theory, surrender and recover, might have a small chance of learning the errors of their ways and making the best out of the rest of their lives. Someone who has been shot dead or killed otherwise is dead forever. No redemption in their character ark, just a sudden end to it all. That’s all theory though, entirely pointless theory. In practice, this won’t happen. Hamas would rather have every last man, woman and child who isn’t on their member list succumb to starvation before any of them have to even miss a meal. It’s a win-win for them: They can blame the suffering and deaths from starvation, just like from bombings, on Israel entirely and enough people around the world will eagerly accept this narrative, even though it takes two to tango.

              Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but this entire conflict has to be one of very few in history where one side is actively trying to increase the suffering on their own side as a weapon of war and manipulation. I cannot think of many other wars where one side implements deliberate measures for more of their own people to die for the purposes of both domestic and foreign propaganda - and being so successful at doing the latter in particular, albeit with plenty of outside help. There really aren’t many equivalents I can think of. The Japanese Empire in WW2 and Khmer Rouge perhaps. The latter is perhaps the most apt comparison, even though what they were doing to their people was being treated as a secret, as they also had a strong support base among the academic far-left in the West, just like Hamas today, with these intelligent, highly educated idealists deliberately ignoring readily available evidence in favor of maintaining their ideologically-driven views.

              There is October 7 denial out there that is completely indistinguishable from Holocaust denial in its mechanisms. The same conspiratorial thinking, the same inane and insane excuses, just with a predominately (but not exclusively) far-left twist instead of a far-right one. As someone who considers themselves fairly left of the center on most issues, it’s quite eye-opening to see just how vulnerable people I have a fair bit in common are to the same kind of manipulation, the same errors of judgment as outright fascists.

              How on Earth do you fight such an enemy and how do you break this spell they have over so many people in the world? There’s a reason why I said that the quicker the war is over, the better. Both the Japanese and the Khmer Rouge were defeated through military action and in both cases, just like with Hamas, any delays in their demise would have resulted in an enormous amount of additional suffering, despite the fact that the methods used to remove them were anything but gentle. That is what Israel has been doing, but it’s important to keep in mind that they are neither the US nor Vietnam, that they can not afford to throw people into the meat grinder. They are more than willing to trade time, Palestinian concrete and also Palestinian lives for keeping their own soldiers safe. Despite the mostly toothless international backlash, this strategy is working, but it is not fast enough for today’s world with its collective median attention span of eight seconds. There is no urban combat equivalent to the breakneck-speed island hopping of WW2 to be found here.

              I’m not really worried about the military outcome of this war. I think it’s only a matter of time - time which civilians in Gaza don’t have though. There is no intentional genocide happening here, but at some point, the number of civilian dead through both Hamas concerted efforts and sheer indifference on the side of the Israeli government will become impossible to ignore and impossible to excuse by the aforementioned valuing of their own side over the enemy. Maybe it’s time to take risks, but that is an almost impossible call to make in a country so small, among a people so small, everyone knows someone who is personally affected by this war. Netanyahu won’t make it, he’s too worried about is fruitless endeavor of saving his own skin - and the IDF, for as much as it is representative of almost the entirety of Israeli society, including people who oppose the ruling coalition, is still beholden to the civilian government and can not on its own decide to accelerate the speed of their assault. Not to mention, a faster war means more civilian deaths in the short term (even if it results in less suffering overall), creating more international outrage, which Israel can only afford up to a point.

              Another hostage exchange ceasefire might give Palestinian civilians the breather they need, but I’m not holding my breath it’s happening and it would most certainly benefit Hamas more.

              To sum this up, a slow war like we have it now is terrible, a faster war is also terrible, but potentially the less terrible alternative in the long run, yet impossible to sell to the public. I have no answer.

              • @OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                811 months ago

                That’s a lot of words to expend on this quite simple issue. You already said you wouldn’t starve civilians, because you are a reasonable human being. Anybody who would is not being reasonable and should be criticised. That’s it.

                A starving person can, at least in theory, surrender and recover, might have a small chance of learning the errors of their ways and making the best out of the rest of their lives.

                “The errors of their ways” - being born in Gaza? Lol what

                • DdCno1
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -111 months ago

                  I was talking about Hamas members. I thought it was pretty obvious from the rest of the paragraph, but if it wasn’t, I apologize for causing a misunderstanding.

              • @commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                211 months ago

                this entire conflict has to be one of very few in history where one side is actively trying to increase the suffering on their own side as a weapon of war and manipulation

                this is how all asymmetric warfare works. the Boston tea party was meant to provoke a response.

          • ???
            link
            fedilink
            English
            811 months ago

            “Look at what you made me do!” says IDF soldier as he shoots an unarmed elderly woman despite her grandson waving a white flag right next to her.

            • snooggums
              link
              fedilink
              0
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              White flags are how we identify human shields!

              -IDF

      • Zengen
        link
        fedilink
        English
        511 months ago

        When your in a warzone, the police no longer have jurisdiction and handling of the civilian populace DOES fall under the army. The aid trucks should be militarily escorted and those protesters should be forcibly moved. Blockading humanitarian aid is an international crime if your a civilian doing that you should be arrested and charged as a criminal.

    • @speaker_hat@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -1911 months ago

      I don’t agree with their action.

      However you can’t judge them because most likely, these people’s relatives or close-ones were either murdered, raped or kidnapped during this war.

      • @OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        20
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        However you can’t judge them because most likely, these people’s relatives or close-ones were either murdered, raped or kidnapped during this war.

        I can. I judge every single person in history and now who has intentionally starved another human being. Fuck them all

      • ???
        link
        fedilink
        English
        411 months ago

        If we can judge Hamas members who have probably lost family and dignity in the most terrible of ways on the hands of Israel, then we can also find it in our hearts to judge those people.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    English
    411 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Demonstrators, including families of hostages still held in Gaza, waved Israeli flags at a key crossing and chanted against “aiding the enemy”.

    For a third consecutive day, the protesters descended on the Kerem Shalom border crossing between Israel and Gaza to try to block humanitarian aid from entering the enclave.

    The demonstration took place amid unconfirmed reports that Israeli and American officials will hold “critical” hostage talks with Qatari and Egyptian mediators in Europe in the coming days.

    The reports suggest that the director of the US Central Intelligence Agency, William Burns, and the Mossad chief, David Barnea, will meet Qatar’s Prime Minister and Foreign Minister, Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman al-Thani, to discuss the release of more than 100 Israeli hostages and a pause in fighting in Gaza.

    The White House has described the talks as “sober” and “serious” efforts, involving players who were key to sealing a previous agreement in November.

    Israel launched its military campaign with the declared aim of destroying Hamas after its gunmen killed 1,300 people - mostly civilians - and took about 250 others hostage, in the unprecedented attack on southern Israeli communities on 7 October last year.


    The original article contains 567 words, the summary contains 193 words. Saved 66%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!