You must log in or register to comment.
Why does Apple need to bring this lawsuit? Why isn’t NSO being prosecuted by the justice department for violating the computer fraud and abuse laws, just as an individual would be if they did the same thing NSO did?
Because various departments of US governments have been customers of the NSO, exploiting the very bug that Apple are suing over.
And various departments of the US government are actively hacking big techs systems, in addition to the backdoor access they legalized for themselves.
Well so is China and anyone with the capability (which is an ever-growing group).
This is the real answer
Because the public attorney system in the US is in disarray and the FTC is weak
Yeah any normal citizen would go to prison and permanently be banned from using any computer but shady companies need to be sued from megacorps and even then the best outcome is that they don’t continue to hack that companies devices.
It’s no surprise that movements like the sovereign citizens believe in magic words that allow them to get away with weird stuff when they see that this is true for these entities. The mistake these groups make is not having a lobby group that turns their insanity into law - but I also don’t want to imagine a world where everyone can act like NSO.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
A US court has rejected spyware vendor NSO Group’s motion to dismiss a lawsuit filed by Apple that alleges the developer violated computer fraud and other laws by infecting customers’ iDevices with its surveillance software.
The lawsuit alleges that company violated the US Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), California’s Unfair Competition Law, and the terms of use for Apple’s own iCloud when its spyware was installed on victims’ devices without their knowledge or consent.
Last March, NSO asked the court to toss Apple’s lawsuit, arguing that Cupertino should be required to sue the developer in Israel, its home jurisdiction.
The court, in its ruling on Monday, dismissed these arguments, noting that “the anti-hacking purpose of the CFAA fits Apple’s allegations to a T, and NSO has not shown otherwise.”
"The technology in question is critical to law enforcement and intelligence agencies in their efforts to maintain public safety.
Apple, meanwhile, took the win, and a spokesperson told The Register that this lawsuit is just one of the ways the iGiant is fighting back against spyware vendors.
The original article contains 491 words, the summary contains 177 words. Saved 64%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
