schizoidman@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 年前Amazon plans to charge for Alexa in June—unless internal conflict delays revamp | Ars Technicaarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square14linkfedilinkarrow-up165arrow-down112 cross-posted to: hackernews@derp.footechnology@lemmy.zip
arrow-up153arrow-down1external-linkAmazon plans to charge for Alexa in June—unless internal conflict delays revamp | Ars Technicaarstechnica.comschizoidman@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 年前message-square14linkfedilink cross-posted to: hackernews@derp.footechnology@lemmy.zip
minus-squareDamage@feddit.itlinkfedilinkarrow-up14·1 年前As long as processing is offloaded to the cloud, something’s gotta pay for it, either a subscription or your personal data. Problem is, I don’t trust Amazon to not double dip, so fuck 'em. We need offline personal assistants, support Home Assistant.
minus-squareⲇⲅⲇ@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 年前Exactly, the problem is that even if you pay for the subscription, they will still use your data for their profit. Big companies are so abusive…
minus-squareAltima NEO@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 年前I mean I thought the whole point of Alexa was to make you buy more stuff from Amazon?
minus-squareprogandy@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 年前For speech recognition there is also heywillow.io
As long as processing is offloaded to the cloud, something’s gotta pay for it, either a subscription or your personal data.
Problem is, I don’t trust Amazon to not double dip, so fuck 'em.
We need offline personal assistants, support Home Assistant.
Exactly, the problem is that even if you pay for the subscription, they will still use your data for their profit. Big companies are so abusive…
I mean I thought the whole point of Alexa was to make you buy more stuff from Amazon?
For speech recognition there is also heywillow.io