Good job failing to understand that this is not a conversation between me and you. I said what I said to avoid Poe’s Law. Just because you didn’t need the obvious stated does not mean everyone will avoid taking implications, even ones that aren’t strictly there.
If you think that’s unneccessary, then you should try having more conversations where you’re trying to get multiple people to understand something. You HAVE to be clear, or others WILL wander in to the weeds and take the completely wrong lesson from something.
Congratulations on failing to understand basic probability… Poe’s Law isn’t about everyone, dumbass. OFC most will get it without additional comment. Where the fuck did I say otherwise? Do you think Poe’s Law says everyone misses the point?
Good job failing to understand that this is not a conversation between me and you. I said what I said to avoid Poe’s Law. Just because you didn’t need the obvious stated does not mean everyone will avoid taking implications, even ones that aren’t strictly there.
If you think that’s unneccessary, then you should try having more conversations where you’re trying to get multiple people to understand something. You HAVE to be clear, or others WILL wander in to the weeds and take the completely wrong lesson from something.
Considering I’m only one of many people that think what you’re saying isn’t right in this context, you should probably follow your own advice.
Congratulations on failing to understand basic probability… Poe’s Law isn’t about everyone, dumbass. OFC most will get it without additional comment. Where the fuck did I say otherwise? Do you think Poe’s Law says everyone misses the point?
Removed. It’s OK to call the subject of an article a dumbass, it’s rule breaking to attack other USERS.
Again, who has said the topic of discussion is good or correct?
No one. It hasn’t even been implied, except by you.
Three strikes and you’re out.
Lmao oh no!
What am I out of? Butter?
Should I go get more milk?
deleted by creator