The claim is a major departure for the service, which has long been known as a destination for posting short snippets of text.

    • @platypus_plumba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -69
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Guys, I think he’s just trolling humanity. If he’s actually trolling, I think he earned my respect. He’d be the biggest troll humanity has and will ever know. Like, the cheer magnitude, the execution… damn.

      • azuth
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5111 months ago

        Nope he is just a rich spoiled manchild on cocaine.

      • @Plopp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2611 months ago

        No troll ever deserved respect for trolling. And I say that as someone who occasionally engages in innocent trolling.

      • @theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        311 months ago

        My theory is he’s pulling a zero requiem. He watches anime, so he’s probably watched code geas - it’s a very popular futuristic anime after all

        First he became the symbol of the useful billionaire, the Tony Stark guy who’s going to save humanity, because he’s a futurist with the power of money. He learns everything about his companies the way a kid learns every stat about their model car, and actually does weirdly good as a hype man. He gives off the awkwardness of an engineer

        After he meets Trump in the white house, he realizes how close we are to the brink. The fact that billionaires own all our media has led to existential danger, where truth doesn’t matter and money speaks

        So, there’s a plan for a group of individuals to buy Twitter. There’s text logs of this - he was invited into a group planning to buy it together for the good of humanity, but it took all of 5 minutes for them to start carving holes in the ideology, so he backs out.

        He then announced the intention to buy, trapping him in a situation where he was forced to go through with it… He struggled a bit, but not that hard really

        So then comes the plan. He takes over, and every two weeks or so, he makes an impulsive decision showing zero understanding of the company. One idiotic decision at a time, spread out long enough to remind people “I’m still here, and I’m still ruining a major platform for public discourse!”

        People start to realize he’s actually kind of dumb and pretty racist… Even the fanboys are getting quieter and quieter in defending him. It’s becoming public knowledge he isn’t a Tesla or spaceX founder, he came in as an investor when they already had a plan

        He’s burning up half his fortune in an effort to show us all what a billionaire is. He’s not a businessman, he went to college to learn programming but doesn’t understand the basics of software, he’s hated by pretty much everyone in his personal life, and every company he’s tried to build from scratch has been a disaster. He lies constantly, in ways that will eventually come to light.

        This guy was able to buy Twitter, just because he invested in a company that bought and sold PayPal (after kicking him out for being unbearable). He’s showing us all that billionaires are an existential danger to mankind, even the “good” ones.

        Or, maybe he’s just having a midlife crisis and has a compulsive need for attention. One of the two.

  • @Sludgehammer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12611 months ago

    “What if we ignored what made our platform successful and instead tried to force our product into a already crowded market?” Elon Musk, Tech genius

        • @Melonpoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 months ago

          So higher gross profit but lower net income from last year which is far lower than their net income from 2019 and their highest in 2018.

          They’ve produced ~4 flops last year that cost them almost $1 billion, their stock price hit a 9 year low last year at below $84, Disney + has been operating at a loss since it started. Universal Studios overtook them with box office revenue last year.

          Unless I’m interpreting that incorrectly it would seem that they aren’t doing too well. Correct me if I’m wrong.

  • @solrize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    101
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Lol, twitter was brilliant when it was 144 character text messages. Then it got ruined by adding photos. Now it is going the rest of the way down the tubes by becoming becoming video first. Ugh.

    • @cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6511 months ago

      Oh yea back when it needed that limit because the whole point was to text it over SMS and you could post with any SMS capable phone lol

      That was fun and unique, now it’s just…boring? Just another social media site, it’s only defining thing is it’s (declining) size and reach

      • @abhibeckert@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3411 months ago

        SMS was the original reason, but the side effect of forcing people to condense their thoughts into a couple sentences was pretty wonderful. Especially for an open ended community where anyone can talk about anything.

        • @Chriswild@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1311 months ago

          I disagree with you simply because brevity is nice but not at the expense of nuance. Having to try to follow a string of tweets because one simply can’t suffice is awful.

          • @Gamoc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            211 months ago

            I don’t understand the difficulty, the series of tweets are all replies to the previous tweet in the chain. Where’s the difficulty?

            • @Chriswild@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              511 months ago

              Likewise I don’t understand the difficulty in reading more than 140 characters.

              But I’ve never used Twitter so when I experience the platform it’s through screen caps of tweets. Instead of having paragraphs and cohesive formatting it reads like a programmer who writes code all in one line. Sure, it can be done and it can be read but it’s fucking awful that it isn’t formatted correctly so that it is more clear.

              • @Gamoc@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                211 months ago

                It’s formatted how you’d expect if you’ve a timeline on anything, most recent at the top though, right?

                • @Chriswild@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  411 months ago

                  Thats not formatting. That’s like reading a book transcribed on post-it notes and calling it a format. It can be ordered, yes but I’m talking about paragraphs and complete sentences.

        • flipht
          link
          fedilink
          411 months ago

          Wonderful in theory, but in practice it’s a dumpster fire. Quick, mainstreamm-acceptable takes are incentived, and nuanced, alternative viewpoints are nearly impossible.

          If it were all for hobby stuff, it would be fine, but when this is how most people get their news, it’s not good.

    • @Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3011 months ago

      Hey at least photos worked…

      Video playback doesn’t work half the time, and the other half the time it insists on 140p playback and then freezes.

      They’re doubling down on something they’ve been failing at for years.

    • @Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      And with this brilliant move they are going to increase bandwidth and storage expenses. There’s a reason why it’s so hard to compete with YouTube.

  • @frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8711 months ago

    It’s amazing watching a platform with no substantial competitor kill itself so badly. AltaVista was killed by Google, MySpace was killed by Facebook, Twitter is killed by the ramblings of the lunatic who bought it.

    • TWeaK
      link
      fedilink
      English
      311 months ago

      You seem to be taking pleasure in it, but the fact is this was the plan from the moment he was locked into the purchase. Buy the business, run it into the ground, destroy the platform that people use to organise on. On the way down, try a bunch of shady shit and see what they can get away with - this will be the new standard for any platform that comes next.

  • Tiger Jerusalem
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5711 months ago

    Of course let’s take a platform that barely holds itself together to show just text and let’s pivot it to be the most technical demanding and expensive kind of service. It will work fine, I’m sure.

  • @edgemaster72@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5111 months ago

    The only thing worse than its video player are the literal nazis on the site, has he tried watching video there? To call it dogshit would be an insult to dogshit, which can presumably be useful as fertilizer.

    • @jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1511 months ago

      It’s funny how Tucker Carlson thought he could just do his show on Twitter and basically instantly lost his entire audience.

    • @Technus@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      611 months ago

      No no no you’ve got it all wrong:

      The Nazis are supposed to be a feature of the platform.

      • Cowbee [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        911 months ago

        Paradox of tolerance and all that. You want a tolerant site? Can’t allow Nazis.

        Secondly, there was a wave of banning of leftists and journalists recently, it’s very much only free speech for the right there.

        • @theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 months ago

          The paradox of tolerance is a gross misunderstanding of the concept of tolerance

          You tolerate your gay coworker - you treat them like a coworker. If any of your coworkers make inappropriate sexual comments or unwanted advances, that’s not okay. You respond appropriately, such as expressing your discomfort to them or going to hr or the police. There’s no conflict

          You tolerate racists - so long as they stay within the social contract, they’re allowed to hold whatever they want in their hearts.

          But if they violate the social contract, such as by saying racist things, you respond appropriately.

          If someone believes Nazi ideas deep down, you tolerate them. If Nazis want to organize, spread their ideals, or do Nazi things, you respond appropriately.

          It’s that simple.

  • NutWrench
    link
    fedilink
    4411 months ago

    How Elon deals with advertising complaints: “Go advertise someplace else.”

    Advertisers:

  • @Coach@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4011 months ago

    I thought Xitter was going to be a bank! Honestly, who can follow the mentally-ill, cocaine-fueled ramblings of this man-baby?

  • BringMeTheDiscoKing
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3211 months ago

    I haven’t been keeping up with the changes to X but I checked out their videos site (xvideos, I presume) and it seems like it’s mostly porn with the occasional Tesla shareholder meeting keynote.

    The keynotes seem a bit incongruous and I could do without them. Otherwise, it doesn’t seem like it’s gone too far downhill.

    • @20inmyhead@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1111 months ago

      If X is becoming a video site, Xvideos should absolutely sue them for infringement on their name.

  • ???
    link
    fedilink
    English
    30
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Has anyone made any piece of technology that could block Elon Musk news? I understand he is currently ruining the world at full speed, but for fuck’s sake, some of us don’t think this is tech news worthy and it’s frankly annoying. He makes it to every paper, then to every news forum. Yuck. Enough Musk spam… you are only doing him favors, even when the news is bad. There is no such thing as bad publicity.

    • @dlok@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      811 months ago

      I’ve seen a Firefox plugin called block the rich… I guess it wouldn’t fly if they called it block Elon

      Not used it so don’t know if it’s any good

      • ???
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Will try now and report back!

        Edit: it’s good. It blurs out text. Sadly not images!

        • ???
          link
          fedilink
          English
          7
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          It blocks these:

          Block List

          • Steve Ballmer
          • Jeff Bezos
          • Michael Bloomberg
          • Sergey Brin
          • Warren Buffett
          • Larry Ellison
          • Bill Gates
          • Kanye “Ye” West
          • Elon Musk
          • Larry Page
          • Donald Trump
          • Mark Zuckerberg

          Immediate observation: really cool, also blocks comments about Elon Musk (including my own lol) Sadly doesn’t block images

          • @Gestrid@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            211 months ago

            Does it block the word “Musk”? Is it case-sensitive? Honestly curious, especially since some of these last names can refer to either the person or a noun.

            • ???
              link
              fedilink
              English
              211 months ago

              It does not block “Musk” or “Elon” when they aren’t in the same sentence It seems to block “musk” or “elon” or “elon musk” in lowercase.

              One problem I noticed is that it slows down the loading of other pages, like Protonmail via the browser, so I had to disable it for some web pages. I don’t think you can individually disable it for certain pages though, so I’d have to turn it on/off.

              One awesome feature that I’d like to see them ad is allowing custom names. I don’t only dislike Elon Musk, but also Taylor Swift and all the other rich people who make it into my news and my brain every single day on every single news outlet… If it’s not about world economy, there really isn’t a reason why Taylor Swift would be on Reuters. There is no reason at all for Elon Musk to be on the news, and when the news is about the lives he ruined, they should put a picture of THEM up, not of his shitty face.

          • @BobGnarley@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -111 months ago

            Yeah thats a great way to stay up to date with technology, just pretend they dont exist!

            • Baggins [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              611 months ago

              What ever would we do without updates on technological marvels such as:

              • Fraudulent car
              • Fraudulent train
              • Low-poly cosplay truck
              • Animal abuse brain microchip
              • Kepler syndrome ISP
              • Self-destructing rocket to mars
              • Social media for Nazis?
              • @nxdefiant@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                English
                211 months ago

                The car is fine, and honestly the software is too, it’s the label that’s the problem. It’s like if Tesla had invented the first really good cough medicine but named it “Death Cure Resurrection Elixir (and cough preventative)” and they have this mustache twirling clown villain selling it.

                I don’t blame anyone for completely disregarding it as fraud.

                • Baggins [he/him]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  211 months ago

                  Well sure it wouldn’t be fraud if you simply don’t lie about what the car does

    • Bilb!
      link
      fedilink
      English
      711 months ago

      I think if you blocked the person who posted this you’d see a big reduction. It’s usually the same account posting Musk news.

      • ???
        link
        fedilink
        English
        511 months ago

        Very good tip, thank you, stranger.

    • @BobGnarley@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      311 months ago

      You realize that you are in a technology news section of Lemmy, right? This dude influences technology.

      • ???
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1411 months ago

        Does he though? Seems like it’s mostly him failing at business.

        Anyway, the news coverage of him is unbalanced because it’s his plan to be on the news constantly and forever.

    • @WhiteWolfLT@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -111 months ago

      Well no, I think bad publicity is a thing, with current cancel culture for saying the wrong things, it can ruin your career. Also pedo allegations do hit hard.

      • ???
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 months ago

        If this was the case, Musk’s career would have been over.

        Instead this publicity fuels him and his wasteful endeavors.

        • @qarbone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          211 months ago

          Your career can only be ruined if you rely on other people to fund your career. He has enough money (and loans and solvent businesses he hasn’t decided to tank yet) independently to keep going when others would have had to pack up.

          You think any other non-billionaire could weather the absolute drain of most advertisers leaving Twitter?

          • ???
            link
            fedilink
            English
            111 months ago

            Your career can’t be easily ruined if you shit gold.

            In a fair world, Musk would be rotting in some sewer.