• @foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1591 year ago

    This is what you get for not castrating them 25 years ago.

    Make internet a utility already, fuck.

  • @paultimate14@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    871 year ago

    I was having a hard time imagining which company this could be. Not that I’m a fan of Verizon or Comcast, but I think they know what side their bread is buttered on. Which one wouldn’t?

    Then I remembered Starlink exists.

    • @Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1681 year ago

      Don’t think they were colluding with the provider. They probably just put a burner sim card into a 4g module and sent data over a VPN to China whenever it had signal.

      • paraphrand
        link
        fedilink
        English
        371 year ago

        It could have even been one of those multi SIM router things that has network redundancy.

      • @postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        The blurb says primarily for navigation.

        So it was using the starlink signals like gps signal and therefore they needed to correlate with the carrier to get a rough time sync.

        I wonder what timing data is freely available on the starlink acquisition signal.

        • @Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Why would they need data then? With GPS can get a 1metre accurate chip for like 20 bucks and it’s way smaller. And no need for any carrier or subscription.

          • @postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            Mapping out network topology? Who knows.

            Whatever the collected data was, it could have been sent to their satellites for long haul back home.

    • @Joker@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      531 year ago

      It’s a satellite provider. Cell networks don’t work at that altitude. Starlink was my first guess too but, after some more thought, it could be Hughesnet. They probably have wider coverage.

  • Tier 1 Build-A-Bear 🧸
    link
    fedilink
    English
    271 year ago

    Wait, you mean US corporations will take money to do questionable things? Surprised Pikachu face.

    Maybe the US government shouldn’t have set the precedent that that was EXPECTED AND ENCOURAGED

  • paraphrand
    link
    fedilink
    English
    171 year ago

    Ok, now tell us what the hell you shot down way up north during that time.

      • @nrezcm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        No that ended up being swamp gas from a weather balloon trapped in a thermal pocket which reflected light from Venus. Pretty common mistake.

      • wagoner
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Please don’t interrupt a conspiracy theory

  • @deafboy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    111 year ago

    I’ll have a good laugh if it turns out the baloon was not chinese after all, it has just contained some iot device with previously unknown call home function to collect diagnostic data.

  • ugjka
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 year ago

    Someone tell China how to install Google earth app

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    English
    91 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Officials familiar with assessment said it found that the connection allowed the balloon to send burst transmissions, or high-bandwidth collections of data over short periods of time.

    Such a court order would have allowed U.S. intelligence agencies to conduct electronic surveillance on the balloon as it flew over the U.S and as it sent and received messages to and from China, the officials said, including communication sent via the American internet service provider.

    “As we had made it clear before, the airship, used for meteorological research, unintentionally drifted into U.S. because of the westerlies and its limited self-steering capability,” Liu said in a statement to NBC News.

    The previously unreported U.S. effort to monitor the balloon’s communications could be one reason Biden administration officials have insisted that they got more intelligence out of the device than it got as it flew over the U.S.

    In an exclusive interview with NBC News this month, VanHerck explained that he worked together with the U.S. Strategic Command, which oversees U.S. nuclear weapons, to reduce the release of emergency action messages to ensure the Chinese balloon could not collect them.

    “Protecting EAM and nuclear command and control communications is of critical importance to the United States,” a senior defense official told NBC News.


    The original article contains 821 words, the summary contains 206 words. Saved 75%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • Kairos
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    Wow really they used infustructure in the United States to communicate with something in The United States instead of putting a super expensive and moving satellite dish on the thing???

  • @Zoidberg@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    The PCC must be feeling all smart about their spy balloon design choices. Just wait until they need to talk to Comcast customer support…