Stamets@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 2 年前The dreamlemmy.worldimagemessage-square238linkfedilinkarrow-up11.98Karrow-down143
arrow-up11.94Karrow-down1imageThe dreamlemmy.worldStamets@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 2 年前message-square238linkfedilink
minus-squareschmidtster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down5·2 年前Shouldn’t there be a catch all term to explain the broader scope of the specifics? Science is a broad term for multiple different studies, vehicle is a broad term for cars and trucks.
minus-squareTheGreenGolem@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 年前Glorified chatbots. Tops. But definitely not something with any kind of intelligence.
minus-squareParetoOptimalDev@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-22 年前Yesterday I prompted gpt4 to convert a power shell script to Haskell. It did it in one shot. This happens more and more frequently for me. I don’t want to oversell llms, but you are definitely underselling them.
minus-squareschmidtster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down3·2 年前Is that not a type of AI already?
minus-squarelad@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·2 年前Well, there’s an argument over not calling machine learning AI in this very thread, so… ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
minus-squareschmidtster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 年前So why suggest it for the catch all term for AI when it’s only one portion of the argument itself? Such a strange suggestion,
minus-squareschmidtster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·2 年前So people think of programming instead?
minus-squareschmidtster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 年前That’s too broad, there’s a reason there is already computer science, science itself, science of chemistry/physics/biology/space etc. Language is fluid, not accepting change just shows how ignorant you are of the broader aspects of the world.
Shouldn’t there be a catch all term to explain the broader scope of the specifics?
Science is a broad term for multiple different studies, vehicle is a broad term for cars and trucks.
Machine learning?
Glorified chatbots. Tops. But definitely not something with any kind of intelligence.
Yesterday I prompted gpt4 to convert a power shell script to Haskell. It did it in one shot. This happens more and more frequently for me.
I don’t want to oversell llms, but you are definitely underselling them.
Is that not a type of AI already?
Well, there’s an argument over not calling machine learning AI in this very thread, so… ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
So why suggest it for the catch all term for AI when it’s only one portion of the argument itself? Such a strange suggestion,
deleted by creator
So people think of programming instead?
deleted by creator
That’s too broad, there’s a reason there is already computer science, science itself, science of chemistry/physics/biology/space etc.
Language is fluid, not accepting change just shows how ignorant you are of the broader aspects of the world.