• InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lamo it was not easy. It was rigorously planned and quadruple checked. Many lab tests and smaller satilite launch to test rockets.

    • bisby@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      In the 1960s we built a moon rocket. Single purpose built for going to the moon and back.

      Today, companies are trying to build general purpose ultra heavy lift rockets and slapping a moon mission on them. Starship? Not a moon rocket. New Glenn? Not a moon rocket.

      Its like living in an RV and saying “living in it isnt the problem, its the plumbing!” Plumbing is an easy solved problem for fixed houses. You’ve only made the situation harder on yourself by trying to be dual purpose

    • GojuRyu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      We did it using analoge technology that is no longer produced and with security standards much lower than is acceptable today. The tech that we are “missing” is modern tech used for the same purposes with acceptable reliability and security. One hurdle with digital over analog is that radiation affects it a lot more. Not insurmountable, but requires work to prove it lives up to modern standards.