True democracy is when the majority (the workers) gets what it wants/needs over the minority (the rich). Does this sort of system prevail anywhere in the world?
Funny how those who don’t want to be part of society still want all the protections and infrastructure provided by society.
They never think about the money they use, shops they visit, the roads they drive on, the clean water they drink, the power they use, the food they access, the regulations and laws keeping them from being forced into slavery or poisoned or killed by their neighbour who wants their stuff, the access to health services, firefighters, police… They somehow never think about what society gives them only what they can take without having to give back.
I think we should let them be free of society, the historical term for that is outlaw, you’re free to be free from society, come back and you get shot.
And your argument about authoritarianism is just stupid, socially agreed upon authority is a necessity for maintaining any set of rules.
I swear you spend hours upon hours just being wrong on the Internet on purpose.
I don’t know what that has to do with the topic. Unless you’re implying that people consent to living in a state of starvation, homelessness, exploitation, etc, and that’s why “democracy” has not fixed these problems.
No. The true left is all about freedoms and rights - liberal democracy. What you call left is the same authorisation shit as right.
Cringe
Yes, pseudo-lefties are cringe indeed.
True democracy is when the majority (the workers) gets what it wants/needs over the minority (the rich). Does this sort of system prevail anywhere in the world?
It works that way pretty much everywhere but the US.
deleted by creator
Nice subject change!
If workers have control of the government, why would there still be a tiny minority that owns everything and a vast majority that owns nothing?
Not everyone wants to own everything. Or even be a part of society. Respecting others is something authoritarian regimes can’t stand.
Funny how those who don’t want to be part of society still want all the protections and infrastructure provided by society.
They never think about the money they use, shops they visit, the roads they drive on, the clean water they drink, the power they use, the food they access, the regulations and laws keeping them from being forced into slavery or poisoned or killed by their neighbour who wants their stuff, the access to health services, firefighters, police… They somehow never think about what society gives them only what they can take without having to give back.
I think we should let them be free of society, the historical term for that is outlaw, you’re free to be free from society, come back and you get shot.
And your argument about authoritarianism is just stupid, socially agreed upon authority is a necessity for maintaining any set of rules.
I swear you spend hours upon hours just being wrong on the Internet on purpose.
Removed by mod
I don’t know what that has to do with the topic. Unless you’re implying that people consent to living in a state of starvation, homelessness, exploitation, etc, and that’s why “democracy” has not fixed these problems.
Which topic? You seem very confused.