• @rtxn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      96
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Like sending “In God We Trust” banners written in Arabic to Texas schools. They don’t like getting done unto them as they do unto others.

      • @PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        261 year ago

        I’m curious about this one. I was amused when it was first done - I think I even donated to the cause, but it’s been awhile and I don’t remember. I don’t know if they ever got any of their signs posted, but I do remember people claiming that the law stated the schools had to post donated signs.

        Obviously it’s a great loophole in a stupid law, and should equally cover Hindi, Chinese, or any other scary language. The law, as originally written, did not specify a language.

        My question is whether it would similarly apply to a sign in English that read “In Allah we Trust.” Since Allah is literally the Arabic word for “god,” it’s semantically equivalent. If so, the same should hold true for similar words from other languages. You might argue that naming a specific god like Vishnu might not pass muster (although I think an argument could be made), but I think that “In Allah we trust” would be almost as defensible as having the entire text in Arabic.

        • @thefartographer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          351 year ago

          Working in a rather large school district and eventually getting to point where I have somewhat more understanding and information about the inner workings of public ed, I can tell you exactly what a lot of Texas schools decided to do after that law passed and then people started donating signs: we immediately put up any sign that met the requirements and then threw them all away at the end of that same day. We have better things to worry about than trollish legislation and the trolls who troll the trolls. At the end of every single day, our main questions are “did we keep the children safe and the parents informed,” and “is our children learning?”

    • @DanglingFury@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      State Rep. Brad Sherman, a Republican, even released a newsletter saying that the principle of church/state separation didn’t apply to this display because the state was inherently Christian. After all, he claimed, the Iowa Constitution refers to a “Supreme Being.”

      According to these opening lines of our Constitution, the foundation for laws and continued blessing and success in Iowa is based on these points:
      
          There is One Supreme God.
      
          Blessings over this state come from the One Supreme God
      
          We must depend upon the One Supreme God if we want to enjoy continued blessings.
      
      It is a tortured and twisted interpretation of law that affords Satan, who is universally understood to be the enemy of God, religious expression equal to God in an institution of government that depends upon God for continued blessings. Such a legal view not only violates the very foundation of our State Constitution, but it offends the God upon whom we depend and undermines our wellbeing.
      
      …
      
      Therefore, based on the laws of God and the Constitution of the State of Iowa, and for the purpose of securing the blessings of God upon our state: 
      
          I am calling for our governor to have this blasphemous display removed immediately based on the grounds that it is unconstitutional and *offends God upon whom the State of Iowa depends for blessings.*
      
          I am calling for clarifying legislation to be adopted in accordance with our State Constitution that prohibits satanic displays in our Capitol building and on all state owned property.
      
          I am calling for legislation to be adopted that makes it legal to display the Ten Commandments in our Capitol, in all buildings owned by the state, and in our public schools.
      
      If we want the blessings of God upon our state, we must demonstrate by our laws and actions that we are indeed depending upon Him and that we are opposed to Satan.
      
    • Uriel238 [all pronouns]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      201 year ago

      They will remember soon enough. When a state takes a religion it is typically pressured to get very specific, and then persecute (convert or imprison / execute) those that do not conform.

      This was is the crux of the issue in the troubles, which is itching to start up again.

  • athos77
    link
    fedilink
    971 year ago

    evangelist Joel Tenney, who wanted someone fired over the inclusion and implied (in the comments) that he would personally vandalize the “grossest form of idolatry I have ever seen in my state.” He even asked his followers, “Who’s gonna bail me out?!”

    No, he deliberately riled up his followers, then referenced the need for “bail money” like six different times. Guy is just after the money. Hmm, I wonder what his holy book says about money?

    Whoever loves money never has enough; whoever loves wealth is never satisfied with their income. This too is meaningless.

    Keep your life free from love of money, and be content with what you have.

    You cannot serve both God and money.

    For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evil. Some people, eager for money, have wandered from the faith and pierced themselves with many griefs.

    Oops

    • @Johnvanjim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      33
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      “It is more difficult for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven, than a camel to pass through the eye of a needle.”

      I don’t know, seems vague…

    • @pandacoder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      Luckily they live in the United States of Amoneyca and they are Coinageans praying to the all mighty green and papery Georgod Washington. They can serve both God and money because they are one and the same.

  • @tsonfeir@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    721 year ago

    There is One Supreme God.

    Clearly they’re talking about Cthulhu, who is not a fan of goats.

      • @tsonfeir@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        Damn thee! That scheming little bitch will crumble before the primal force that is our one true god!!!

        • @YungOnions@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          81 year ago

          DAMN ye! Let Neptune strike ye dead, tsonfeir! HAAAAAARRRRRK! Hark! Triton! Hark! Bellow! Bid our father, the Sea King, rise from the depths, full-foul in his fury, black waves teeming with salt-foam, to smother this young mouth with pungent slime, to choke ye, engorging your organs 'till ye turn blue and bloated with bilge and brine and can scream no more… only when, he, crowned in cockle shells with slithering tentacled tail and steaming beard, takes up his fell, be-finnèd arm – his coral-tined trident screeches banshee-like in the tempest and plunges right through yer gullet! BURSTING YE, a bulging bladder no more, but a blasted bloody film now – a nothing for the Harpies and the souls of dead sailors to peck and claw and feed upon, only to be lapped up and swallowed by the infinite waters of the Dread Emperor himself, forgotten to any man, to any time, forgotten to any god or devil, forgotten even to the sea… for any stuff or part of tsonfeir, even any scantling of your soul, is tsonfeir no more, but is now itself the sea!

  • @douglasg14b@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    511 year ago

    Wow, that rep has no business being a representative when they can’t even understand what separation of church and state means. And somehow are intellectually challenged enough to believe that being a “Christian state” means the law no longer applies…?

    Wtf

  • gregorum
    link
    fedilink
    English
    321 year ago

    “Stop challenging my mythical worldview! Whaaaaaaa!”

    lmao

  • BeautifulMind ♾️
    link
    fedilink
    English
    281 year ago

    I’m just watching here as this guy gets super-angry about blasphemy

    And wondering if he realizes this is exactly why we need separation of church and state

  • @GBU_28@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    261 year ago

    These topics interest me because I can imagine how inflexible religious fundamentalists must be.

    Like, to atheists or satanists seeing a Christian display is at most annoying.

    For hardcore Christians seeing a satanic display is a literal challenge from God to be strong, to be loyal. They see it as a glitch in the matrix or some shit, like a virus.

    Same as Muslims and displays of Muhammad.

    They simply can’t compute the continued existence of such things.

    And it makes me laugh.