flop_leash_973@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 年前Epic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app store fightwww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square253linkfedilinkarrow-up11.58Karrow-down122file-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldprivacy@lemmy.mlgames@sh.itjust.worksandroid@lemmy.worldhackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up11.56Karrow-down1external-linkEpic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app store fightwww.theverge.comflop_leash_973@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 年前message-square253linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldprivacy@lemmy.mlgames@sh.itjust.worksandroid@lemmy.worldhackernews@derp.foo
minus-squareTheMurphy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up44arrow-down1·2 年前Yes, but US favour companies over people.
minus-squareaidan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·2 年前I’m pretty sure the ruling in this post is in the US.
minus-squareRogueBanana@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down4·2 年前That’s why we are surprised. But given this went through, maybe they could go for it again who knows.
minus-squareagitatedpotato@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-22 年前And it’s two companies fighting, how far did the anti monopoly pushes against apple and google get before Epic took them up because they were a profitable venture?
minus-squareMr_Blott@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up40arrow-down1·2 年前Yeah but they also have more rights than the consumer, rather than the other way about lol
minus-squareaidan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 年前I’m pretty sure the ruling in this post is in the US
In the US it does.
Yes, but US favour companies over people.
I’m pretty sure the ruling in this post is in the US.
That’s why we are surprised. But given this went through, maybe they could go for it again who knows.
And it’s two companies fighting, how far did the anti monopoly pushes against apple and google get before Epic took them up because they were a profitable venture?
Yeah but they also have more rights than the consumer, rather than the other way about lol
I’m pretty sure the ruling in this post is in the US