• @NZV65572@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    151 year ago

    Glad they shut turned it off so I can continue to look down on all my friends who still don’t have an iPhone.

  • Savaran
    link
    fedilink
    -11 year ago

    Company blatantly violates terms of service, surprised that access is shut off.

  • @M500@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -101 year ago

    I didn’t read the article, but Apple does advertise a certain level of privacy and security with iMessage. A company getting around that kind of defeats apples “promise”.

    So, I don’t blame them for turning it off, but they realistically should bring iMessage to android.

    • @ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      13
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Not really. Just because they reverse engineered the protocol does not mean it is insecure.

      I guess we know too little to say much about that topic.

      • @M500@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Well if it’s all handled by Apple I can assume that there is a reasonable amount of security in the way the message is stored.

        If a third party gets involved, then I don’t know if the message is read, copied, or stored insecurely by them.

        • @ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          Well if it’s all handled by Apple I can assume that there is a reasonable amount of security in the way the message is stored.

          If a third party gets involved, then I don’t know if the message is read, copied, or stored insecurely by them.

          I reall hope apples does not store or can even read the data. Otherwise it would be a really bad messaging protocol (privacy and security wise).

    • @loki@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Advertising privacy does fuck all when Apple has been allowing the government to read push notifications. Where does that promise fit in, while they knowingly supply what the government wants and then still market itself as a privacy friendly company?