• @rickdg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    131 year ago

    In the case of Trump, you always have to ask “or else what?” If it doesn’t have consequences, it doesn’t exist.

  • FuglyDuck
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 year ago

    I have an idea.

    how 'bout we just lock the fucker away like all the other people who are indicted on felonies and waiting for their court date?

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    English
    21 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The three-judge panel’s ruling modifies the gag order to allow the Republican 2024 presidential front-runner to make disparaging comments about special counsel Jack Smith.

    But the court upheld the ban on public statements about known or reasonably foreseeable witnesses concerning their potential participation in the case.

    “It captures some constitutionally protected speech that lacks the features or content that would trench upon the court’s proper functioning or ability to administer justice.”

    Tracking the cases In addition to four criminal indictments, Donald Trump is also fighting a civil lawsuit that threatens the future of the real estate empire that vaulted him to stardom and the presidency.

    U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan imposed the gag order in October, barring Trump from making public statements targeting Smith and other prosecutors, court staff and potential witnesses.

    The order has had a whirlwind trajectory through the courts since prosecutors proposed it, citing Trump’s repeated disparagement of the special counsel, the judge overseeing the case and likely witnesses.


    The original article contains 314 words, the summary contains 162 words. Saved 48%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!