If you do, then what exactly defines a soul in your view?

  • Rikudou_SageA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s not inconclusive, it’s improvable which basically means “why even bother?”

    • ritswd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I don’t disagree with “why even bother”. But again following the scientific method, it wasn’t proven to be improvable. Scientifically speaking, we just don’t know.

      I realize it’s not a very comforting thought, though. And I don’t mind people who believe otherwise.

      • Rikudou_SageA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        it wasn’t proven to be improvable

        If it’s something invisible with no physical manifestation (as the soul is thought to be by the believers), it’s quite literally improvable.