One more step to unhitching from Google…

Right now the only option I see in F-Droid is Aegis.

I’m not sure what to actually look for side from checking for unexpected permissions and reasonably frequent updates.

Hopefully something I can sync with a GNOME app…

  • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    I use Aegis, automatically backed up every time a new key is added. Was using Authy for a while, but they’re going down the enshittification hole, so I dumped them.

  • zingo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Aegis.

    I like the auto backup feature (encrypted) . Then the backup is synced to computer via Syncthing.

    Set and forget setup.

    • Ohh@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      For me aegis is by far the best. Simple. Encrypted. Backup. It’s saved to a syncthing folder. Passwords are in bitwarden for simpme stuff but keepassxc is great. And also synced via syncthing.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yah, I can’t see a point to have another app/extension when Bitwarden has it built in, and it’s a great password manager.

      • waspentalive@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        But if they get your Bitwarden vault and crack it - they have everything Throw a roadblock in their way - use a separate app for OTP.

      • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        The point of 2FA is “something you have” and “something you know” to enter a secured system.

        If you put both of those into one system that is accessible by one password, the whole concept is defeated.

        • ikidd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          My threat model isn’t having someone take my computer and log into stuff so my concern when using 2FA is more about them having gotten hold of a password remotely. But a TOTP makes that password pretty hard to use, no matter where it’s stored. And my BW is also protected by a Yubi/password combo, so I guess I’m just vulnerable to having that beaten out of me.

        • ikidd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Right under Password in the edit screen of an item: Authenticator Key. You put in the auth key the target site provides you when you enable TOTP and it will start generating timed tokens. Usually you’ll also get a one-time pad of backup keys, I usually toss those in the Notes of the edit screen there as well in case something goes wrong.

    • TedZanzibar@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s niche but I like to point it out whenever I get the opportunity: if your workplace uses Bitwarden Enterprise, every licensed user gets a free family plan that can be linked to any account. I haven’t personally paid for BW for years.

    • HereIAm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Same. Self hosting it sounds nice, and I self host a handful of services, but I don’t want to be stuck without passwords in another country with a dead server at home because a power cut happened at some point.

        • az04@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 days ago

          I had fault in my server this summer and my local bitwarden app wouldn’t work without the connection. Same in my laptop, if the connection is blocked by the firewall it doesn’t let me load the vault at all.

          • EpicStuff@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            bitwarden works fine for me without connection, you just cant update/create passwords

        • HereIAm@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Oh, that’s actually good to know. I guess it makes sense for when you don’t have a good connection as well.

    • Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      As I’ve seen gaming server subscriptions go from £36/y to £23/m (Xbox) in a few years, and cloud CCTV storage from £40/y to £16/m (Google via acquisition of Nest) in a few months, I say we count our stars when a subscription cost remains fair.

  • Curious Canid@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’ve been using Aegis for several years now without any problems. It replaced the Google Authenticator seamlessly.

      • Lucy :3@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Tbh, if you’re using the same DB for PWs, you’ve successfully downgraded to 1FA now. Except maybe if you use a seperate KeyStick/Yubikey as secret bearer or smth

        • hikaru755@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          4 days ago

          More like 1.5FA, at least. It still protects against passwords being compromised in any way that doesn’t compromise full access to your password database, which is still a lot better than using just passwords without a second factor.

          • example@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            that’s like calling strong randomly generated passwords 1.5FA.

            with proper MFA, even if you steal my password (database), you won’t be able to steal my account, as you’re missing the second factor. with classic otp this is just a single use number you enter on the potentially compromised system, but if you get the seed (secret) stolen, valid numbers can be generated continuously.

            password managers (should) protect against reuse. MFA protects against logins on untrusted and potentially compromised systems/keyloggers if they’re not extracted live. password managers with auto fill and phishing resistant MFA can prevent phising, although the password manager variant is still easily bypassed when the user isn’t paying enough attention, as it’s not even that uncommon for login domains to change. obviously there are also other risks on compromised devices, like session cookie exfiltration, and there is a lot of bullshit info around from websites, especially the ones harvesting phone numbers while claiming to require it for 2FA just to gaslight users.

            • hikaru755@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              even if you steal my password (database)

              That’s a big leap you’re doing there, equating stealing a password to stealing a password database. Those are very different. Stealing a password can be done through regular phishing, or a host of other methods that don’t require targeted effort. Stealing a password database, if properly set up, is a lot harder than that. It depends of course on what password manager you’re using, but it usually involves multiple factors itself. So equating that to just a password, no matter how strong and random, is just misleading.

              Mind you, I agree that it’s less secure than “proper” MFA, and I’m not saying that everybody should just use MFA through a PW manager. I am using physical security keys myself. But for a lot of regular people that otherwise just couldn’t be bothered, it’s absolutely a viable alternative that makes them a whole lot safer for comparatively little effort. Telling them they just shouldn’t bother at all is just going to create more victims. There is no such thing as perfect security, and everyone has a different risk profile.

        • nover6@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          I would say it still counts as 2fa just shifting what is verifying you to your password manager and using the site password and 2fa as a way to verify the password manager with the site. If setup right they would have to have the database and your password to decrypt it not just one or the other and for password managers that sync the database it should require your password and 2fa to sync to a new device so it can’t just be freely grabbed. If that doesn’t count as 2fa then I would like to see an argument about how okta signing you into sites counts as 2fa as it is basically the same thing.

  • nickiam2@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yubikey. It supports TOTP as well as passkeys. Plus is a physical device separate from my phone. Recommend getting 2 to have 1 as backup