I cannot parse that mess of a comment. In case you change it:
Laura Loomer has already condemned to action, and I’m pretty sure she’s not the sort to let facts get in her way.
She condemned to [sic] action, she’s a liar, she’s telling the truth on this one. ?
No idea what that fruitcake has to do with any of this. Can you point to a non-factual anything in my comment? Cut out any bit you like. Show me where the lie touched you. Don’t insinuate anything! Reply to the words I stated.
I think dagwood there is agreeing with you, but saying that you present the facts as though the propagandists might correct the narrative if they understood. Dagwood thinks that’s naiive, and trots out Loomer as an example of the bullshit at work.
Whew! Took my dumbass a minute, and an explanation to parse that. Still a little confused.
OP made a false statement which I corrected. No, facts don’t matter in the wider world, but they mostly do around here. I mean, this place isn’t exactly FaceBook.
I cannot parse that mess of a comment. In case you change it:
She condemned to [sic] action, she’s a liar, she’s telling the truth on this one. ?
No idea what that fruitcake has to do with any of this. Can you point to a non-factual anything in my comment? Cut out any bit you like. Show me where the lie touched you. Don’t insinuate anything! Reply to the words I stated.
I think dagwood there is agreeing with you, but saying that you present the facts as though the propagandists might correct the narrative if they understood. Dagwood thinks that’s naiive, and trots out Loomer as an example of the bullshit at work.
How’d I do?
That’s exactly what I meant.
Whew! Took my dumbass a minute, and an explanation to parse that. Still a little confused.
OP made a false statement which I corrected. No, facts don’t matter in the wider world, but they mostly do around here. I mean, this place isn’t exactly FaceBook.