I understand, but that’s not the game here. They will always find a way to discredit the argument. You can keep taking the high road but they are holding you to a standard they only apply to one side of the argument.
Gazans are starving = pre-existing condition, we are providing food, it’s a publicity stunt…
They are targeting journalists/aid workers = they are Hamas, they are harbouring Hamas, they were warned, it was a communication error, it was operator error, it was a malfunction.
But don’t you dare show two satellite images that aren’t from the same time of year, that’s clearly misinformation!
Hey buddy, jump on in. Gas lighting me isn’t going to work. I responded to what I read, I don’t give a shit what you think. But maybe you and the other guy can catch up and have a good cry about it.
It’s about not giving your opponent any ammunition to discredit your argument.
I understand, but that’s not the game here. They will always find a way to discredit the argument. You can keep taking the high road but they are holding you to a standard they only apply to one side of the argument. Gazans are starving = pre-existing condition, we are providing food, it’s a publicity stunt… They are targeting journalists/aid workers = they are Hamas, they are harbouring Hamas, they were warned, it was a communication error, it was operator error, it was a malfunction.
But don’t you dare show two satellite images that aren’t from the same time of year, that’s clearly misinformation!
Nobody said this was misinformation, they just pointed out how this could be more effective. Gosh.
Yes, the date, that’s what’s going to swing their support… Missed opportunity. Gosh.
You are utterly unable to engage with what someone actually says to you, aren’t you?
Hey buddy, jump on in. Gas lighting me isn’t going to work. I responded to what I read, I don’t give a shit what you think. But maybe you and the other guy can catch up and have a good cry about it.
Also not what anyone said.
Yes they did :)
k.