dudeM to newsEnglish · 5 days agoMosque fire being treated as arson and hate crimewww.bbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square8linkfedilinkarrow-up115arrow-down10
arrow-up115arrow-down1external-linkMosque fire being treated as arson and hate crimewww.bbc.comdudeM to newsEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square8linkfedilink
minus-squarelurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-25 days agoi don’t see how this would instill terror in the government and make them change some policy. (change what btw. fireproof mosqes?) i don’t even see this terrorising a voter group big enough to influence the government indirectly. but i acknowledge that terrorists usually aren’t very bright, so if they are terrorists, they maybe believe it works like that.
minus-squaremrdown@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 days agoTerrorism acts rarely made a government bend to their demands or policies changes. It doesn’t have to successful to be an terrorist act If terrorists was not bright in a certain aspect they would never succeed in accomplish any attacks
minus-squarelurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·4 days agonah, terrorism is one of the easiest stupidest things, because it’s impossible to protect against. every idiot can start a fire or blow himself up. and even then, some terrorists fail, meaning they are the stupidest of the stupid.
minus-squaremrdown@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 days agoNot all terrorist attack are simple as start a fire or blowing up
minus-squarelurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·4 days agobut they can be. adding extra points of failure through complexity is even more stupid
i don’t see how this would instill terror in the government and make them change some policy. (change what btw. fireproof mosqes?)
i don’t even see this terrorising a voter group big enough to influence the government indirectly.
but i acknowledge that terrorists usually aren’t very bright, so if they are terrorists, they maybe believe it works like that.
Terrorism acts rarely made a government bend to their demands or policies changes. It doesn’t have to successful to be an terrorist act
If terrorists was not bright in a certain aspect they would never succeed in accomplish any attacks
nah, terrorism is one of the easiest stupidest things, because it’s impossible to protect against. every idiot can start a fire or blow himself up. and even then, some terrorists fail, meaning they are the stupidest of the stupid.
Not all terrorist attack are simple as start a fire or blowing up
but they can be. adding extra points of failure through complexity is even more stupid