• nicetriangle
      link
      fedilink
      511 year ago

      It would horrify people how much brand new product is just destroyed by companies for a tax write off.

  • @dil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    371 year ago

    Fuuuuuck yes. All the clothes that we’d otherwise ship off to other countries as trash should just be free for anyone to have. Even clothes that are ripped could be used for something, e.g. making a quilt. It’s messed up to waste the effort and infrastructure that goes into making fabric, let alone a final piece of clothing.

    • Drusas
      link
      fedilink
      201 year ago

      The article says it’s aimed at fast fashion, so luxury brands are almost certainly exempt.

      • @geissi@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        aimed at fast fashion, so luxury brands are almost certainly exempt

        That would depend on the specific wording but if they define minimum standards and the ‘luxury brands’ already fulfill those then I don’t see the problem.

        How else would they exempt them? Even the most corrupt lawmakers don’t just write brand names into their legislation.

        • @theolodis@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          181 year ago

          Luxury brands usually produce in the same places as fast fashion, the only difference is their margin when selling. If you want it sustainable and with fair working conditions, it’s also cost about the same, but you’d have to look for it (and probably will only find a few products of luxury brands)

          • @ebikefolder@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 year ago

            That’s why I have my own definition if “luxury”: Sustainable materials, humane working conditions, timeless style, long lasting construction etc.

            I have to look for it, especially since I buy second hand, but not very often because of, well, whatever I buy is timeless and long lasting. No need for frequent replacement.

  • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺
    link
    fedilink
    English
    321 year ago

    Fast fashion is responsible for up to 10% of global cimate impact. It is long overdue and the whole industry needs to be dismantled. From the fashion of the season magazines over the instagram and tiktok people buying clothes just to wear them once to the companies that produce for most to go into the thrash and only last three wears at best.

  • qyron
    link
    fedilink
    English
    281 year ago

    A good iniative. Even if products end price rise, if things start to be made to last again, it will for the best.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    English
    151 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Negotiators from the European Parliament and EU member states on Tuesday reached an agreement to stop large retail groups of destroying unsold clothes and footwear.

    Brussels is seeking to address textile consumption in Europe, which has the fourth highest impact on the environment and climate change after food, housing and transport.

    The latest agreement comes as part of a wider initiative after the European Commission proposed changes to the bloc’s so-called ecodesign rules.

    MEP Alessandra Moretti, who spearheaded the legislation through parliament, said: “It is time to end the model of ‘take, make, dispose’ that is so harmful to our planet, our health and our economy.”

    Full details of requirements for individual products have not yet been finalized with parliament and member states still needing to officially approve the agreement, although that this is believed to be a formality.

    The agreement outlined that the European Commission can issue legally binding requirements to make goods such as furniture, tyres, detergents, paints and chemicals more environmentally friendly.


    The original article contains 326 words, the summary contains 162 words. Saved 50%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

      • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶
        link
        fedilink
        English
        141 year ago

        There’s another bot that will post alternative links for youtube so you don’t have to view videos on youtube. They are pretty helpful

      • Rentlar
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Since a long time. However if this concerns you, you can turn off all content posted or commented by bots from appearing on your feed. Go to your settings page and uncheck “Show Bot Accounts” then click the “Save” button nearest below it.

        Lemmy settings page screenshot

        Enjoy!

        • @LemmyHead@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Doesn’t bother me at all. A tldr bot was something I was missing here and didn’t know until now that it was here all along

      • jlow (he/him)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        This one has been around since I started using Lemmy (whenever that Reddit debacle was, October?). I like it.

        • @poppy@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          101 year ago

          (whenever that Reddit debacle was, October?)

          I’m sorry to inform you that was in June.

    • @fatalError@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      When they will get stuck with stock because ppl are going for discount unsold stuff that can’t be destroyed anymore, they will be forced to stop overproducing.