- cross-posted to:
- climate@slrpnk.net
- cross-posted to:
- climate@slrpnk.net
Food and agriculture contribute one-third of global greenhouse gas emissions – second only to the burning of fossil fuels. And yet the vast majority of media coverage of the climate crisis overlooks this critical sector, according to a new data analysis from Sentient Media.
The findings suggest that only about a quarter of climate articles in 11 major US outlets, including the Guardian, mention food and agriculture as a cause. And of the 940 articles analyzed, only 36 – or 3.8% – mentioned animal agriculture or meat production, by far the largest source of food-related emissions.
The data reveals a media environment that obscures a key driver of the climate crisis. Meat production alone is responsible for nearly 60% of the food sector’s climate emissions and yet its impact is sorely underestimated: a 2023 Washington Post/University of Maryland poll found 74% of US respondents believe eating less meat has little to no effect on the climate crisis.
I agree. And the line that I quoted from the article is the opposite of this; it is leading the reader to believe that the “climate footprint ranking” of animal agriculture is lower than that of fossil fuels. Regardless of whether we are trying to change anyone’s mind or what we think is the most effective way to do so, providing false or misleading information is something to avoid.