did you read the article? the draft was voted on by a committee, so it had to be read by other people. honestly, work like this is perfect for LLMs like chatGPT. what is concerning about this for you?
edit: checked your profile to see if I was replying to a child or an adult. all I had to do was see the words eat the rich in bold to realize that im actually replying to a psychopath lmao.
did you read the article? the draft was voted on by a committee, so it had to be read by other people. honestly, work like this is perfect for LLMs like chatGPT. what is concerning about this for you?
Removed by mod
why should it concern me? I don’t understand the danger.
Removed by mod
fair point to make, and I mostly agree.
Removed by mod
Because life requires actual human participation and you can’t be a lazy asshole who lets AI, or anything else for that matter, do the living for you.
Removed by mod
Wall-E
Removed by mod
I agree, but this is work for language written in law. how does what you say tie into this scenario?
side note, I think everyone who believes what happened here is not good has never collaborated on writing a large document before.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Projection
what does that even mean
edit: checked your profile to see if I was replying to a child or an adult. all I had to do was see the words eat the rich in bold to realize that im actually replying to a psychopath lmao.