In a video statement, Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu called the growing MAGA conspiracy a ‘monstrous big lie.’

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 hour ago

    damn, i didn’t think they did until they said they didn’t. one thing i know is that they can’t tell the truth

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    23 minutes ago

    It’s clear that Zionist supremacism was a central issue in the murder. Netanyahu’s absurdity statement proves it.

    There are 2 wings of Christofascism. The dominant Zionist first, Judeo-Christofascism, and the obvious alternative of Groyper/Fuentes concern that Israel first rule over America feels wrong. Qatari funding to be against Zionist supremacist rule over America is simply not needed.

    Robinson, if he did it, seemed to be of Groyper wing of Christofascim. Kirk distancing himself from Ackman’s Zionist absolutism, would make sense for Kirk’s credibility even if devoted, as Netanyahu confirms, to Zionist supremacism rule over America. Kirk simply cannot be as demonic as Ackman on genocide and absolutist rule, and have his audience take him seriously.

    It’s not as though the US is going to investigate Ackman for any role in this, anymore than they let the dancing Israelis “there to document the event” flee the US after 9/11.

  • leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Makes sense, they’re reaching the point where it’s more efficient to list the people they haven’t killed.

    • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Confirmed: When I read this headline I thought “uhhh kinda weird; who asked?”

      Qanon. Of course Qanon asked.

      • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        41 minutes ago

        Even a broken clock is right twice a day. The murder of Charlie Kirk continues to benefit some of the most powerful individuals and banks with ties to Epstein.

        The Senate called for this investigation hours before he was killed

        So if anybody was paying attention to that right now instead of the threats of civil war, that would mean that people would be looking at the relationship between Epstein and individuals like Netenyahu, Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem, Bill Gates, Elon Musk, and Peter Thiel, as well as the banks that helped fund them like JP Morgan, BNY, Bank of America and Deutsche Bank.

        Or at least, people would be noticing the Republicans have voted 3 separate times to block this investigation starting on the day Kirk was killed.

  • nozone@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    This is going to make the conspiracy nuts latch on even harder. You just Streisanded yourself, dumbass.

    ps: The American right wing hates Jews almost as much as they hate Muslims.

    • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 minutes ago

      As Netanyahu’s open love for Charlie Kirk shows, Christofascim exists to direct hate towards Muslims. Replacement theory is about not letting Judeo-Christian “foundation of America” (1776, really?) get diluted by muslims and other ethnicities hatred of supremacists by their declaration of war in producing non-conforming future voters.

      Anti semitism is the greatest tool for Zionist supremacist hate groups, like the ADL or Bill Ackman, to get a pretense for media airtime in which to advocate for genocide.

      Proud boys members came to CA University protests in order to bash anti-genocide protestors. Hatred that is more focused on muslims than jews is the goal of Zionist supremacism, and the hatred of Jews, extremely useful to convincing simpletons that victimhood deserves their supremacism.

    • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      51 minutes ago

      I’m not right wing, I’m not antisemitic, and I never liked Charlie Kirk.

      Still think there’s a good chance Netenyahu was involved in his death. I don’t believe he acted alone though. Hours before he was killed the house and the Senate tried to investigate connections between Epstein, big banks like JP Morgan, Netenyahu, Elon Musk, and others. Republicans in the House and Senate blocked it and barely anyone noticed bc suddenly Charlie Kirk was assassinated and a bizarre series of incidents allowed the killer to get away.

      Trump immediately began calling for war on the left and Elon Musk suddenly went on his white supremacy world tour.

      The investigation into the suspect has been botched as fuck, and they claim that they had a note he wrote confessing to the murder but it was destroyed.

      The House voted again yesterday and again Republicans blocked a subpoena of big banks involved in this connection. And once again barely anybody noticed bc the Trump admin is still distracting with war on the left avenging Charlie Kirk’s murder (which they most likely helped carry out).

      Kirk was rumored to have refused to accept money from Israel, but he also had been one of the few right wing propaganda outlets who backtracked after making the statement that he wouldn’t talk about Epstein. He made the statement then after backlash from his fans he said he would keep covering it.

      There were several powerful individuals that would have been very angry at him and also needed a big distraction right around the time he was assassinated. The question is who actually gave the order for the go ahead? Who orchestrated it and who sent who to carry it out?

      P.s.: I love Jews and I love Muslims. I hate corrupt governments and individuals that use entire groups of humans as a scapegoat to distract from their own evil bullshit. We used to call people that did that Nazis.

    • quick_snail@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      They do so many (illegal) international assassinations, it’s good to clarify

      See also Mossad

    • ALQ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      106
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I feel like I would suspect them less if they hadn’t said anything. Most of Israel’s formal statements regarding allegations of Israeli violence are lies, so what would make this statement different?

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Eh, there was “evidence” (a third-party tweet) that Kirk was worried about being killed by Israel shortly before his death.

      It’s not like this came out of nowhere.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        13 hours ago

        He was a raging antisemite. Of course a raging antiemetic whack job would be concerned about them killing him.

        • primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Wait, antisemite definition one ‘hates Jews’ or antisemite definition two ‘thinks Palestinians are people’? Definition one has nothing to fear.

          • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            The original, actual, sense.

            He’s a white supremacist. He hated anyone who isn’t white. He’s said some pretty horrific things about Jews, even if he’s nominally okay with an Israeli state (because fascists of a feather…)

              • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                7 hours ago

                I dunno.

                They didn’t ask me if they should.

                (and the only- and I mean only- reason I’d be inclined to say they did kill Kirk was because they just let everyone know they most certainly did not kill him.)

                There’s a funny babylon 5 clip here. the backstory is that her boss, Captain Sheridan, asked her to slip in that nothing happened in sector 83x9x12. She balked saying that her thing not being propaganda. She gives in, because in point of fact nothing happened, at all. He also did other things like having a fleet of ships move around and shoot random rocks in quiet spaces… all because he was trying to get a cantankerous group of allied worlds (ironically named, “league of non-allied worlds”…) to sign a thing bringing them into a more formal alliance. These worlds saw the whites stars shooting at the rocks, saw the announcement, and were like “White stars don’t shoot at nothing! there must be an enemy we can’t see!” (and then handed him everything he wanted.)

          • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Definitely 1. Is position over Israel and Palestine seems to have been all over the place. There are videos of him saying Netanyahu is lying about Gaza, and he we was firmly against Israel’s attack on Iran, but then he would also say absurd stuff like there’s no starvation in Gaza.

  • MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Incidentally, why don’t we all play with the same truthiness ruleset?

    Benjamin Netanyahu ordered the hit on Charlie Kirk.

    We know with certainty that Donald Trump did not order the hit, as he’d be bragging about it.

    • TallonMetroid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Do we really, though? I don’t trust El Taco to remember what he’s wearing at the moment, let alone whether or not he ordered a hit.