• Zexks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I advocate that we start calling anyone calling for sympathy for this shit bag woke. See how quick it flips their script suddenly doing woke things.

    • 4am@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      They’re already doing cancel culture so let em be woke now too, fuck it

    • Soulg@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I dunno I couldn’t give less of a fuck about him but I do feel bad for his kids

      • fishos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        In his own words, kids should witness public executions. He literally wanted his kids to see this. Do you really feel bad for the kids knowing that he would have just indoctrinated them too? I feel like they were liberated from a lifetime of abuse.

        • Verdorrterpunkt@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Hey i really dislike punishing kids something they can’t control, for example having dipshits as parents or being poor. I would argue them not seeing a person get shot and not be indoctrinated is the best outcome.

          • fishos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Now, again, remember that their father would WANT them to watch someone get shot. It’s not “either or”. He’s a dipshit father AND he wants to subject them to abuse like watching an execution.

            You’re basically just saying “yeah, it would be great if they had completely different parents”. Sure, that’s true. But they have the parents they have and one of those parents is a racist piece of shit who would work to make them racist pieces of shit. Someone who if they were raped would force them to carry the baby to term and raise it.

            At least in this circumstance there’s the possibility that when they get older and learn about WHY their dad was shot, they might see how terrible his positions were and not want to be like him. Instead of being raised by the man who would likely make them watch other people be killed and laugh about it.

            Do I really need to remind you of his stance on Nancy Pelosi’s husband? He was asking people to bail out the attacker because he was a true patriot.

            Dude was a piece of shit and everyone who no longer gets influenced by him is better off, full stop. Nothing that happened to him is anything that he wouldn’t have celebrated if it was “one of them”.

            Those kids are better off.

            • Verdorrterpunkt@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              I am not disagreeing with you about them being better off without the dude. I just made the case for being in favor of the best possible result, yknow, where there is no punishment based on kinship. I don’t see how anyone profits from adhering to any of kirks ideas.

              • bthest@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Who is punishing the kids?

                They’re only part of the discourse because people who “feel bad for them” keep dragging them into it. The best thing anyone can do for them is to stop bringing them up. They’re completely irrelevant the monstrous things that Charlie Kirk was doing.

                • Verdorrterpunkt@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Deciding that kids should be exposed to such violence is decidedly punishing them.

                  I agree they shouldn’t be brought up, but they were.

                  • fishos@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 month ago

                    So your gripe is with Charlie Kirk who wanted exactly that, not me. He wanted that exact world and died in that exact way BECAUSE OF HIS BELIEFS. He was the one punishing his kids, not us.

      • Stamau123@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Why? Cuz now their dad can’t force them to have their rape baby like he went on record as wanting?

      • athatet@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 month ago

        He said that if his daughters get raped he would make them give birth and take care of the rapists baby. They are absolutely better off without him.

      • Lawelen@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Why? I’d be glad if my father died. Preferably before bringing me into this shithole