• Another Catgirl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      I hope farmers refuse to buy any weeding machine that they don’t fully own (right to repair, etc.)

  • @Lordbaum@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    Looks cool and probably really useful, but I don’t know how much sustainable future relies on Monocultures, because of loose of biodiversity, soil etc you know the drill.

    • Star
      link
      fedilink
      6
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I agree with the other commenter. This is step one. One day will be robots that can maintain healthy food forests.

    • Another Catgirl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      for food forests, you just need to add a tool-switching machine similar to how some CNC mills can automatically switch tools.

  • Another Catgirl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    I’ve seen lasers do the same job more effectively. An attachment for a combine.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    English
    11 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    So a Swedish company named Ekobot AB has introduced a wheeled robot that can autonomously recognize and pluck weeds from the ground rapidly using metal fingers.

    It’s tuned for weeding fields full of onions, beetroots, carrots, or similar vegetables, and it can cover about 10 hectares (about 24.7 acres) in a day.

    It navigates using GPS RTK and contains safety sensors and vision systems to prevent it from unintentionally bumping into objects or people.

    To pinpoint plants it needs to pluck, the Ekobot uses an AI-powered machine vision system trained to identify weeds as it rolls above the farm field.

    Two years ago, Ekobot announced a collaboration with Swedish telecom company Telia that led to the integration of 5G mobile technology into the robot, which lets it communicate remotely with a central server to share collected learning data from anywhere in a farm field.

    When coupled with research on lasers that zap pests in flight, AI may help pave the way for a more sustainable and environmentally friendly farming system if widely adopted.


    The original article contains 487 words, the summary contains 173 words. Saved 64%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
    link
    fedilink
    01 year ago

    Operating this at scale will be a problem. Yes, you can make one this big, but how durable is it when you build one at industrial scale? If you need a million little tiny fingers working for days at a time, what’s the mean time to failure and how hard are they to replace?

    • Star
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      How many people do you think are weeding at a time on a farm? And at what rate?

      This is absolutely scalable. It doesn’t need to be bigger. It’ll just go row by row like every other farm tool :)

      • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Right, but how long will it last before it breaks? If it can only do an acre of crops before part of the mechanism breaks it won’t get adopted by farmers.

        • Star
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          How long until your car breaks? These aren’t going to be flimsy machines. What makes you think they would be?

          • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            That’s why I’m asking, there’s no details in the article about its expected lifetime and that’s important for adoption

            • Star
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              I meant to convey that the machine isn’t going to fail after one acre or any other small amount. It won’t be built out of legos ;)

              And shouldn’t the end-game be to eliminate the need for human labor for these grueling jobs? Even if the first iteration isn’t quite as good, it is important to look to the future.

              • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                I agree that it’s a good thing, but I don’t think you understand the point I’m making, so I’m ending it here.