• RedPandaRaider@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Workplaces, at least under capitalism, aren’t a voluntary hierarchy. You have to sell your labour to survive.

      • Valmond@lemmy.worldBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        The acceptance of hierarchy, as I have often seen, is very often even wanted.

        • stray@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          I think you mean the way workers organize themselves? Like at my workplace our internal organization among coworkers is voluntary and friendly, but our employment is very much not.

          • Valmond@lemmy.worldBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Well no, I’m talking about lots of people who gladly just sits at their level at work accepting the manager is the decider etc.

              • Valmond@lemmy.worldBanned from community
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Everyone needs to pay rent and eat, but that was not the question.

            • stray@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              I’m sure there are people for whom the arrangement of being laborers is not distressing, but the fact that they’re in that position at all is coerced by the fact that they need income to acquire the basic needs of life. It’s like how slavery is still bad even if many of the slaves are treated well. Maybe they would be doing something else if they weren’t forced to work for someone else, but we’ll never know because they don’t really have a choice.

      • Valmond@lemmy.worldBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        That doesn’t mean we go there involuntarily. Femdom also gives you something back.

        • jwiggler@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I wouldn’t exactly call the workplace voluntary though? When the alternative is to be without “legitimate” access to primary needs like food, shelter, healthcare, etc.

          Id say it’s more coercive than anything.

          But yeah voluntarily hierarchies still exist, it’s just that normally they’re meant to dissolve. Like a student-teacher hierarchy

          • null@lemmy.nullspace.lolBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Is it possible for those needs to be met systematically without some kind of coercion?

          • Valmond@lemmy.worldBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            The acceptance of the hierarchy is not always but often volontairy. Or that is what I have seen, a lot.