cm0002@piefed.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 个月前You typical Node projectlemmy.mlimagemessage-square67linkfedilinkarrow-up1589arrow-down18 cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1581arrow-down1imageYou typical Node projectlemmy.mlcm0002@piefed.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 个月前message-square67linkfedilink cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-squareStarvingMartist@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 个月前Off topic but what’s the point of a book that thick other than novelty? Would make much more sense to just separate into volumes
minus-squaredeadbeef79000@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·edit-22 个月前You get books like that for voluminous stuff like parliament debate transcripts for an entire parliamentary term. They’re generally one-off or only a handful printed and kept as archival records. Almost noone would ever need the physical book, it exists as a physical tome to cite/reference.
minus-squareBJ_and_the_bear@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 个月前Seems like it would break quickly with use
Off topic but what’s the point of a book that thick other than novelty? Would make much more sense to just separate into volumes
You get books like that for voluminous stuff like parliament debate transcripts for an entire parliamentary term.
They’re generally one-off or only a handful printed and kept as archival records.
Almost noone would ever need the physical book, it exists as a physical tome to cite/reference.
Seems like it would break quickly with use