What irks me the most is the spinelessness of a lot of mods. Shadow banning and banning without an explanation just striffling free speech without acountability. Freedom of expression should not be subject to the whims of individuals!

If this gets me banned than you are worse than spez

  • BigBlackCockroach@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m saying that the opinions that people piled onto were generally worth piling onto.

    Oh come on you know this isn’t true!

    On numerous reddit communities there was a very slim overton window and if you say something that is totally a reasonable thing to say you but diverges from the consensus you get downvoted to oblivion and sometimes even mods take action. You know this is true. Don’t believe me google it. Otherwise I’m going to assume you are not arguing in good faith.

    • GhostsAreShitty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Freedom of speech is not the same as freedom from consequences for your speech. Your definition of “reasonable” doesn’t sound like it’s reasonable by the consensus of users on Reddit. It seems like you’ve been fairly gun shy about posting what these “legitimate opinions” are. On Reddit, I would get in arguments with liberals a lot, because I consider them entirely too right leaning. But it never resulted in mod action or even downvoting, it was a discussion. There is one kind of opinion that pretty consistently resulted in downvoting, and especially mod action. And those kinds of opinions should be downvoted. The only things I can think of otherwise are people criticizing mods or Reddit itself and getting banned by power hungry admins, but as others have said, go to a different community if you see that.

      • BigBlackCockroach@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Freedom of speech is not the same as freedom from consequences for your speech.

        It is when it comes to the consequence being not being able to speak. if my speech has at its consequence that it pisses off people in power in a group then freedom of speech means that they wont stifle my speech when it threatens their power or is deemed undesirable for other than rule breaking reasons.

            • ZahzenEclipse@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Are you in favor of firing teachers who day things that go against common popular teachings in an area?

              Your mocking of this situation makes me feel you’d be in favor of laws that fire teachers for teaching evolution for example.

              • GhostsAreShitty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                No? Evolution is a fact. Would I want teachers fired for saying things that are objectively not true? Or teaching opinions as facts? Yeah. More red flags in “go against common teachings,” here.

                • ZahzenEclipse@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You need free speech to ensure teachers don’t get fired for teaching science. I’d be care about removing that ability from other roles and people just because you disagree with the premise.