• ricecake@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 年前

    A company giving special access to it’s competition on a platform they control is usually used as an indicator of not being anticompetitive.

    I hadn’t considered it from a “collusion” angle.

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 年前

        Eh, when Microsoft was required to ask you which browser you wanted, they didn’t need to offer every browser, just theirs, firefox and Chrome.

        This could definitely be collusion, but I don’t think that not extending it to all competitiors is what makes it that.