You must log in or register to comment.
Me burning to death fixing pylint warnings before I can commit my code.
Melting because someone didn’t configure the right profile and now isort and black are fighting over imports.
Why is the wrong version always the one that is posted.
The (in my eyes) correct (and iirc original) version is:
- Git commit
- Git push
- Get out*
*as someone pointed out (and I remember it as well, but thought I rembered it wrong and corrected it, shame on me in this context) the last point may be originally “git out”
i might remember it wrong…but was it not ‘git out’?
It is
Honestly I remebered it as “git out” as well, but that would be semantically incorrect and “get out” seems close enough.
Here
git outis mentionedThat is so much better 👍
I remember creating an alias for “git out” which worked like teamware or meecurial’s “out” (outgoing) command to show you what you would be pushing to a branch.
Merge conflict
Here at Company Inc, we continue to send our thoughts and prayers to the 38 interns who perished in the office fire of ‘07. Sixteen years later, we still mourn the loss caused by this unpredictable, unpreventable, and unlitigatable accident. We hope that, in time, the grieving families of those interns are eventually able to move on with both their hearts and their loved ones’ funeral expense debts.
Should’ve pulled first before starting your work.
Sometimes my work takes a while and other people push in the meantime. Guess I’m dying the fire.
Then you pull before committing.
Boom, merge conflict. The only thing left to me is force push and delete everyone’s changes.
Eh, it’s probably fine. Those chumps don’t do anything useful.
On a push? What are you merging there?
Ofc, you might be working directly on develop/master/shared branch, I know people that work in those environments (ew)
Right, on shared branch you might need to pull first if you’re out of date (and you would be if you’re all leaving the office at the same time), and that could cause a merge conflict.
It’s like I always said, bad branching strategies are a fire safety issue.
i read a reddit post years ago where a someone wrote a script that iterates through all the projects in their dev folder, for each project creating a new branch, committing and pushing.
they then aliased it to “fire” or “panic” or something like that.
not a bad idea really
As in one they’d manually run if there was a fire?
Exactly. The alias just points to the script which is executed.
Ohh I see so you just run git fire?
if its aliased you should be able to just run “fire” and it does the rest
Oh bash alias right
Slight correction. In case of fire:
Git checkout -b firemyusername Git commit -am=“fire” Git push.
We don’t want to have conflicts with code versions when going in on a rush, better to create a new branch. We can merge all the conflicts afterwards.
Oh man I hadn’t seen a
git checkout -bin years haha since they introducedswitchandrestore, never looked backI’ll admit I just press the buttons in my favourite IDE and had to look up the commands to remind myself, but yeah.
Isn’t that what git stash is for though?
Can’t push a stash
Can’t you? Could’ve sworn you could
I’ve done it with TFS source control at least, thought it would be possible with git
git push origin refs/stash@{$n}:stash/$USER/$niirc
Gonna need some semicolons or double ampersand in there
Nah, what I need is doble new lines of code blocks since this is markdown and it fucked the display.
Here you go:
git checkout -b firemyusername git commit -am="fire" git pushI know how to do it, I was just lazy lmao.
Cause of death: 15 minute long pre-push hook
Just
git add . && git commit -m "sorry theres a fire" && git push -u origin feature/fireAnd run out. It will eventually finish pushing. Or not.
git add .; git commit -nm fire --no-gpgsign; git push -n origin fire/${USER}
In case of
Git commit
Git push origin main --force
Fire
*git out
*git -tf out
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
“I followed the rules, Boss. Not my fault the rules are stupid 🤷♂️”
You could change it to
git commit .to add and commit everything. But just in case you weren’t up to date, you should probably dogit commit . git pull -s ours git pushFor maximum chaos.
Mark this shit NSFW. I could have viewed it at work.
Counterpoint: Virtualized environment/remote desktop. The real computer is in a data center hundreds of kilometers away with world class fire suppression systems.
Counter counterpoint: If you’re virtualized you might be working from home, in which case, that’s rough, hope they manage to restore your house.
With a laggy desktop experience i also can’t really configure how i want? No thank you. It’s bad enough i have to use Windows for software development instead of letting me install Linux
I like it because I don’t have any of the company’s shit on my own machine. I absolutely don’t trust them not to spy on my personal computer use if they had access to it. With remote desktop I close it at the end of the work say and it has no more access to my computer than I have access to their critical systems.
In my case, their shit that we’re required to use don’t even support Linux so if it wasn’t for virtualized environment I’d had to install Windows on my own machine.
Fair, good point. I guess i’m lucky that i don’t have to use my own devices, my machine is provided by my employer.
no changes added to commit (use “git add” and/or “git commit -a”)
It should (at least) be:
git commit -a -m "🚨🔥🚨" git push --forceBetter, create a new branch and push it to origin(?).
Better have not created any new files tho - git commit -a doesn’t catch those without an add first.
So we need
git add .&&git commit -ahere reallyIn which case the -a isn’t needed.
And if your git repo is self-hosted on-prem, you’d better be helping pack it and carry it out.
I’ve got something similar on my office door that reads
In case of fire git commit -a git push git -tf out
