Lydia_K@startrek.website to Risa@startrek.websiteEnglish · 2 年前Philosophical franchisesstartrek.websiteimagemessage-square38linkfedilinkarrow-up1412arrow-down15
arrow-up1407arrow-down1imagePhilosophical franchisesstartrek.websiteLydia_K@startrek.website to Risa@startrek.websiteEnglish · 2 年前message-square38linkfedilink
minus-squareDecoy321@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up70·2 年前Name one problem you can’t solve with enough c4.
minus-squareGodnroc@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up45·2 年前I was going to say “too much C4” but, no, that could solve that too.
minus-squareMajorHavoc@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·2 年前Mind blown… Everything else… Also blown up.
minus-squareCoderKat@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 年前I think you can actually solve that one with enough C4 :p
minus-squarebionicjoey@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up32·2 年前“Every time I had a problem, I threw a Molotov C4 at it and then I had a different problem”
minus-squareDecoy321@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·2 年前Ah, the Mendoza philosophy of problem solving!
minus-squaremilkisklim@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 年前Jason figured it out?! Jason? Wow, this is a new low…
minus-squarexePBMg9@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 年前Unifying quantum theory and general relativity?
minus-squareDecoy321@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·2 年前Sounds pretty tough, let’s start with a dozen and work our way up.
minus-squareDr. Bluefall@toast.ooolinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 年前A dozen what of C4? Kilotons? Megatons? Solar masses?
minus-squaretslnox@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 年前You will need a relatively high quantum of C4, duh.
minus-squareeva_sieve@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 年前"It seems like a reasonable response to me. As the size of an explosion increases, the number of social situations it is incapable of solving approaches zero. "
minus-squareDecoy321@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 年前Ah, gitp never disappoints with the sage advice.
Name one problem you can’t solve with enough c4.
I was going to say “too much C4” but, no, that could solve that too.
Mind blown… Everything else… Also blown up.
Indeed.
Not enough C4?
I think you can actually solve that one with enough C4 :p
“Every time I had a problem, I threw
a MolotovC4 at it and then I had a different problem”Ah, the Mendoza philosophy of problem solving!
Jason figured it out?! Jason? Wow, this is a new low…
Bortles?
Unifying quantum theory and general relativity?
Sounds pretty tough, let’s start with a dozen and work our way up.
A dozen what of C4?
Kilotons?
Megatons?
Solar masses?
Yes
You will need a relatively high quantum of C4, duh.
"It seems like a reasonable response to me. As the size of an explosion increases, the number of social situations it is incapable of solving approaches zero. "
Ah, gitp never disappoints with the sage advice.
Morgana’s dragon.