fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agoAAAAtomsmander.xyzimagemessage-square124linkfedilinkarrow-up1993arrow-down156
arrow-up1937arrow-down1imageAAAAtomsmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square124linkfedilink
minus-squareiturnedintoanewt@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down1·1 year ago…96? How is 96 a point of reference when you are making a scale from scratch?
minus-squareMargot Robbie@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·1 year agoI think it’s because 96 is divisible by 3.
minus-squareJolteon@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 year ago96 is divisible by 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8
minus-squareAlaskaball [comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year agoah 7 and 9 are missing because 7 ate 9 and is on the run from the law
minus-squarephotonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·1 year ago100 is divisible by 5, so what’s your point?
minus-squareℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·1 year agoEasier to subdivide a physically measured scale when the reverence is divisible by multiple values to choose from…
…96? How is 96 a point of reference when you are making a scale from scratch?
I think it’s because 96 is divisible by 3.
96 is divisible by 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8
ah 7 and 9 are missing because 7 ate 9 and is on the run from the law
100 is divisible by 5, so what’s your point?
Easier to subdivide a physically measured scale when the reverence is divisible by multiple values to choose from…