• @tankplanker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 year ago

    It just shows up how pathetic their pretence at wanting free speech and preventing deplatforming is. Really what they want is their lies and hate mongering to be unchallenged and their challengers to be shut up.

  • @byroon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    Trust the Observer to find stuff like this and frame it as “hugely embarrassing for [the] Conservative party”. I don’t think these people will be embarrassed about anything except perhaps being found out

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    English
    41 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Fifteen government departments have been monitoring the social media activity of potential critics and compiling “secret files” in order to block them from speaking at public events, the Observer can reveal.

    The revelations will be hugely embarrassing for a Conservative party that regularly claims to champion free speech and has slammed universities for allowing students to “no platform” experts with whom they disagree.

    Tessa Gregory, partner at Leigh Day, who is pursuing legal action against the government on behalf of at least two experts, said: “This is likely to have impacted large numbers of individuals, many of whom won’t know civil servants hold secret files on them.

    Dan Kaszeta, a chemical weapons expert, was disinvited in April from giving a keynote speech at a UK defence conference after officials found social media posts criticising Tory ministers and government immigration policy.

    But in response to an FoI request from the campaign group Privacy International last year, the DfE said three times that it “does not conduct monitoring, investigations or intelligence gathering on members of the public”.

    Smita Jamdar, partner at law firm Shakespeare Martineau who has been advising universities on how not to fall foul of the government’s new higher education “free speech tsar”, said: “The double standards here are astonishing.”


    The original article contains 986 words, the summary contains 210 words. Saved 79%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!