Cooperative Android manufacturers only get 12 percent of search revenue

How much more does Google pay for an Apple user than an Android one? A lot. It was recently revealed in the Epic v. Google trial (Google has a few monopoly lawsuits going on) that the highest tier of search revenue share for cooperative Android OEMs is only 12 percent, a third of what Google pays Apple. In terms of total cash amount, it’s reasonable to assume Apple gets more total money than many smaller companies but to see the direct breakdown that each Apple user is worth three times more than an Android user is a new insight.

  • SokathHisEyesOpen
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    Is that because it’s a closed ecosystem? Google also made the OS for Android, so don’t they have a lot of control there?

    • anti-idpol action
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      But iOS users are, however, usually not technically literate and privacy-conscious enough to

      1. Change their search engine engine
      2. Block ads ads

      and usually also somewhat more impressionable by marketing (I mean they bought an iPhone after all) and have higher income

          • SokathHisEyesOpen
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            I was able to block ads on Safari Mobile with a plugin called Crystal adblock, or something like that. It worked pretty well for the browser. Obviously adding custom DNS works better since it applies to everything. Their custom DNS is a little annoying though, because you can only add it to WiFi, not cellular. At least that’s how it was when I left for Android about a year ago.

          • @einsteinx2@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            This is patently false… iOS has a whole content blocking system and a plethora of ad blocking extensions available. And no it’s not just DNS blocking, it removes the elements just like on a desktop browser. And yes in regular old Safari, not Brave.

  • @onlinepersona@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    I just hope Google loses the case. We need more search competition without some monetary barrier. If a small company makes a better search engine than Google, it shouldn’t require them to pay Google amounts of money to be even be considered on a list.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    English
    11 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The big participants in this program are/were Motorola, LG, and HMD, which had at least 98 percent of their devices qualify.

    Other brands like Xiaomi, Sony, Sharp, and BBK (that’s OnePlus, Oppo, and Vivo) were at 70 percent.

    Android partners don’t just get search revenue; they also get a cut of Google Play app sales and ads run on their devices.

    Notably absent from that list is Samsung, which, as the biggest Android OEM, has its own deal with Google.

    We’re unsure how that was calculated, but Apple gets an $18 billion-a-year lump sum payment plus the 36 percent revenue share.

    Pichai recently justified the huge payment gap by saying that Google has to share Android revenue with carriers, too, but that’s not true in Apple’s case.


    The original article contains 626 words, the summary contains 127 words. Saved 80%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!