• DaPorkchop_@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I think they’re on the end of the catwalk right above the small building in the corner, which would make sense since they’d have to appear in the middle of the sphere unless the image is cropped. Hard to be sure with this resolution, but I’d bet those few lighter pixels are the person holding the camera.

  • Frenchfryenjoyer (she/her)
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t know what it is about the 1960s but I love the vibe of the technology. planes, cars, spaceships tended to have that chrome/bare metal look. i love it

    • Ushmel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      We made better materials to reflect the sun stuff at some point. The chrome does look dank AF though

  • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    162
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    PAGEOS had a diameter of exactly 100 feet (30.48 m), consisted of a 0.5 mils (12.7 μm) thick mylar plastic film coated with vapour deposited aluminum enclosing a volume of about 524,000 cubic feet (14,800 m3)[8][9] The metal coating both reflected sunlight and protected the satellite from damaging ultraviolet waves. The satellite was launched in a canister, which explosively separated as it was ejected from the rocket. Then, the balloon was inflated through a combination of residual internal air and a mixture of benzoic acid and anthraquinone placed inside, which turned to gas when the satellite was exposed to the heat of the sun.[9] It was the first satellite specifically launched for use in geodetic surveying,[3] or measuring the shape of the earth, by serving as a reflective and photographic tracking target. At the time, it improved on terrestrial triangulations of the globe by about an order of magnitude.[4] The satellite, which carried no instrumentation, broke up between 1975 and 1976.

    Wikipedia

    This was super interesting to read about. I thought the picture surely had to be CG or AI created at first.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Interesting. I wonder if the canister could fit in a modern microsat. Might be possible to recreate it for (relatively) cheap.

    • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      2 days ago

      Over five years, 16 groups conducted observations at 45 globally distributed stations, about 3000-4000 km apart from each other.[4][7][12] 12 mobile tracking stations were used, which observed during favorable weather conditions during a few minutes of twilight each evening.[7][why?][clarification needed] BC4 cameras were used to photograph the satellite.[12] Observations were taken when the satellite was visible simultaneously to multiple stations at the same time.[12] This resulted in the fixing of the precise locations of 38 different points around the world.[4] This could be used to help determine the precise locations of the continents relative to each other, and to help determine the precise shape and size of the earth.

      that is amazing! so cool

      • DrownedRats@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        That’d actually very similar to how trig points work! It’s a giant orbiting trig point. Someone call the ordnance survey!

      • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 day ago

        And it sounds like it was usable for 9 years. That’s impressive for a very thin balloon surrounded by 50,000mph dust particles

    • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Remember this experience when someone “knows” something is AI because It’s “obvious”, and don’t call me Shirley!

  • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Have you tried everything?”

    “Everything, sir, it’s completely impregnable.”

    “We must get inside. For all we know, something may be living or perhaps even dying inside this”

    “It appears to be seamless–no way in, no way out.”

    • Obinice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      You know its reflective surface? Well, uh…

      I hate to be the one non-scientist that picks this up, guys…

      …What worries me is that it’s reflecting everything but us.

      • fubbernuckin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Could be a tilt shift lens which can distort perspective and make a photo look as if it’s being taken from a slightly different angle. Not sure what to look for to disprove that hypothesis though.

      • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        i noticed that in the OP too and it confused me a bit. then i noticed the dark corner bottom left, which is probably a bit of the wall of the dark room the picture was taken out of. that’s why the photographer isn’t in the reflection.

        • Natanael@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Just look at the center of the sphere. You see distant scaffolding and walkways. The camera could be a small one set up there.

      • addie@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        I really like the book - I think it’s one of his best. Subtle ‘unreliable narrator’ mind-fuck from beginning to end, nicely written and characterised. The film of it is an abomination, though.

        • BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’ve not read the book yet but I’ve seen the movie and it’s enjoyable by itself, maybe not a great adaptation, but still it was not terrible

  • Thorry84@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    2 days ago

    For those wondering: it was inflatable. So it didn’t weigh very much and wasn’t very big at launch. It then inflated to this huge size shown here.

  • Gork@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 days ago

    This looks like such a non-human design that I would have mistaken it for a UFO if I found it in space.